<!--
	Title: (Adventure) Suspect
	Source: Zzap!64, #14
	Date: June 1986
	Transcription by Steve Derby
-->

*Infocom, £25 plus VAT, disk only*

<img class="float-right" src="/public/img/articles/zzap64-ballyhoo-review/ballyhoo-pamphlet.png" alt="Ballyhood circus pamphlet">

The White Wizard sat at his trusty 64 in stunned
silence as the world fell about his ears. Surely
not ... No, it couldn't be ... You don't mean.

Yes, I'm afraid so. An era has passed, ladies and gentlemen. Then
Bearded One has finally come across an Infocom game that
doesn't make the 90% league. But hold it right there! It's still in the
eighties, and it costs a bit less than the other full-price Infocom gems
at only £25 (excluding VAT). Will this be the first Infocom game you
miss out on? Here's the news, so judge for yourself.

*Ballyhoo* is written by a relative newcomer to Infocom -- Jeff O'Neill,
and it's his first Infocom offering. Perhaps we can therefore
excuse him for not coming up with something of the standard
we expect from say, Steve Meretsky of *Sorcerer* fame. It's difficult
to put ones finger on what exactly it is about *Ballyhoo* that doesn't
quite engender the sparkle of earlier releases. The setting is ingenious --
a circus big-top, complete with surrounding out-houses,
menageries, caravans, and a host of First of Mays, Joeys, roustabouts,
and even a keister or two. Just in case that's got you foxed, I
should explain that there's a crash course in authentic circus slang
included with the game (along with your ticket, a balloon and an
ad for Dr. Nostrum's Extract).

Hanging around after the show you just happen (you would,
wouldn't you?) to hear the circus manager chewing the cud with a
local private eye. The aforesaid cud is slightly muffled, but by
hiding in the near vicinity of the gents in question you hear that
Chelsea, the circus man's daughter, has gone missing. Fired with
righteous indignation and an unhealthy desire to tickle the
circus fat lady, you decide to look for the girl yourself.

There are some stunning locations. I don't recall when I last
hung out inside a lion's cage, but I shan't be doing it again in a hurry.
As to my visit (wearing a gorilla costume) to the gorilla cage --
well, the less aid the better.

Puzzles range from the insignificant (dodging under the edge of
tents to avoid paying admission) to the enormous (a fat lad so
large she takes up two whole locations). The difficulty is pitched
just about right (Infocom call it 'standard' level), but there were
one or two places where I felt that the Infocom magic was slipping
slightly. Would you believe a spelling mistake (eek!)? And a
case where the word 'bars' was interpreted as 'passage'? In any
other game these would be par for the course -- and the course
would be well run -- but in an Infocom game they stick out of the
screen like an elephant in a pink tu-tu.

Apart form the teensy-weeniest little errors like these, there was
something else about the game that didn't quite bowl me over. I
don't know exactly what it was (perhaps I'm just not a circus fan)
but somehow it seemed to lack some of that dreamy quality that
gives other Infocom games their special quality and gripping
atmosphere.

When I went back to the game after a pause for reflection, I found
myself still harbouring faint blasphemous doubts. There's no
doubt, however, that there's a lot of fun to be had nonetheless. I
climbed up to the trapeze artists' nest, had my palm read by Rimshaw
and toted the circus dwarf round a bit. All jolly good fun, but
I didn't get very near to solving the mystery and there's obviously a
good deal of gameplay here to give you your money's worth. Still, the
doubts remain (though further play has alleviated them --
slightly).

No, really, I'm feeling quite embarrassed saying all this. By
any normal standards the game is excellent -- but is it truly excellent
by the standards that Infocom have set themselves? Of that I'm
not convinced but I'd be very interested to hear what other
*Ballyhoo*ers have to say. In the meantime, I think I'd probably
shell out the readies for this one -- but then for some of Infocom's
other recent titles I'd shell out almost twice as much and still feel
that I hadn't been ripped off.

<p class="larger" style="font-weight: bold;">Atmosphere 86%<br>
Interactions 90%<br>
Lasting Interest 91%<br>
Value For Money 80%<br>
Overall 88%</p>
