#
ISSUE #47 - January 16, 2007

          ___.               .___              _             ___.
         /  _|               |   \            / \           / ._|
         \  \                | o_/           |   |          | |_.
         .\  \               | |             | o |          | | |
    The  |___/ociety for the |_|romotion of  |_|_|dventure  \___|ames.

                             ISSUE #47

            Edited by Jimmy Maher (maher SP@G grandecom.net)
                           January 16, 2007

               SPAG Website: http://www.sparkynet.com/spag

    SPAG #47 is copyright (c) 2007 by Jimmy Maher.
    Authors of reviews and articles retain the rights to their contributions.

    All email addresses are spamblocked -- replace the name of our magazine
    with the traditional 'at' sign.

    ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE ----------------------------------------------------

    Editorial
    IF News
    A Eulogy for Star Foster by Daniel Ravipinto
    A Timeline of the French IF Community by Eriorg
    An IF Competition 2006 Rant / Review Package by Valentine Kopteltsev

    INTERVIEWS IN THIS ISSUE --------------------------------------------------

    Adrien Saurat
    JB
    Eric Eve
    Nolan Bonvouloir
    Emily Short

    REVIEWS IN THIS ISSUE -----------------------------------------------------

    The Apocalypse Clock
    Aunts and Butlers
    Beam
    Delightful Wallpaper
    Ekphrasis
    An Escape to Remember
    Floatpoint
    Game Producer!
    Green Falls
    The Journey of the King
    Labyrinth
    Last Resort
    Pirate Adventure
    The Reliques of Tolti-Aph
    The Tower of the Elephant

    SPECIFICS
    =========
    Damnatio Memoriae

    EDITORIAL------------------------------------------------------------------

    I was contacted a few months ago by "A Ninny," editor of the Adult IF
    community's equivalent to SPAG, with a request for an interview.  It turned out
    to be quite a positive experience for me, allowing me to clarify my own thoughts
    on certain aspects of IF, largely in the problematic area of NPC interaction.
    Whether it is of use to anyone else is of course an open question.  Anyone
    interested in the result can find it here:
    http://home.grandecom.net/~maher/if/interview.htm.

    My purpose here today is not self-promotion, however, but to fulfill a bargain I
    made with Mr. Ninny.  In my recent history of IF, I gave the AIF community very
    short shrift.  One might even call my approach dismissive.  Mr. Ninny and his
    friends in that community took a certain (luckily good-natured and gracious, at
    least on Mr. Ninny's part) exception to my portrayal of their work, and
    challenged me to play three recently written AIF games suggested by them as
    representing some of the best of their community's work.  I was a bit reluctant,
    as pornography of any stripe is not my bag at all, but agreed to have a look in
    the interest of fairness.

    The three games I played were Tomorrow Never Comes by A. Bomire, a secret agent
    caper set in the universe of James Bond; Ideal Pacific Coast University by
    NewKid, another addition to the venerable genre of collegiate IF; and Peril in
    the Skies by Adam Hendine, an adventure tale set in the 1930s involving a
    protagonist with more than a passing resemblance to Indiana Jones.  All three
    games were written in TADS, thus proving one of the assertions of my history --
    that the AIF community was still writing largely in AGT -- wrong right off the
    bat.  Obviously, I have some revising to do there.

    The quality of the games was... surprisingly high in some ways.  All three
    reasonably well-written and felt quite robust.  While none do anything
    groundbreaking, I think each would be reasonably well-received by the mainstream
    community if the sexual bits were removed.  None are of XYZZY-winning quality,
    but all would be quite capable of finishing in the upper half of the Competition
    if entered (and if, again, the sex was not present.)

    Actually, the sex is the strangest thing about these games, in that none of them
    are, ostensibly at least, really ABOUT seduction.  Each has a more typical
    adventure game plot, onto which the sex is grafted, sometimes downright
    awkwardly.  In Bomire's game, the sex is actually completely optional.  In the
    others, the sex is necessary to complete the overarching goals, and "scoring"
    generally involves solving some fairly typical puzzles to get one's target
    interested.  I probably don't need to mention that one plays as a male in all of
    these games.

    The NPC interaction is, as expected, rather painful.  Much more time seems to
    have been spent on each woman's bit and pieces than on giving her a real
    personality.  They are like textual blow-up dolls rather than NPCs, and what
    personality they have is generally mired in the worst sort of cliche.  These
    women think and act like men (or boys) who have had little contact with women
    think women think and act.  Even though these games were blessedly free of
    sexual violence, there is still a whiff of misogyny that was not to my liking.
    The worst offender here was NewKid's effort, which at one point has the player
    seducing the leader of the campus' feminist organization in a power fantasy that
    I would rather have not experienced.

    I won't launch into more detailed reviews here, but will conclude by saying that
    the modern AIF community's work is better than I had thought in many ways, but
    exactly what I expected in others.  I have no particular desire to play more
    games of this stripe, but reasonably enjoyed at least two of these when the
    explicit sexual material was not present.  That material I just found tedious.
    Call me a prude if you like, but I think sex is something best enjoyed between
    two people who care for one another and are both, well, real.  As for fiction,
    it is more interesting to me when it focuses on the psychology of sex rather
    than the mechanics.  If only psychology were one of IF's strengths...

    But in the mainstream IF community, the news is very positive.  We had what in
    my opinion might just have been the strongest field of Competition entrants ever
    last fall, and closed out the year with several more very interesting releases.
    This is the largest issue of SPAG I have published as editor.  In addition to
    the expected Competition coverage, there are plenty of non-Competition reviews.
    Also included is an introduction to the French IF community, hopefully first of
    an ongoing series of articles about the other IF communities.  And then there is
    the article I feel best of all about publishing, even as I wish I didn't have
    to: Daniel Ravipinto's eulogy for Star Foster, co-author of 2003's Competition
    winner Slouching Towards Bedlam who recently passed away far too young.

    IF NEWS -------------------------------------------------------------------

    IF COMPETITION RESULTS
    The 12th Annual IF Competition is complete, and has produced a wonderful field
    of games, many worth playing for years to come.  Everything about this year's
    event was positive to my mind.  There were lots of efforts written in next-
    generation IF development systems Inform 7 and TADS 3, including all three of
    the top finishers; the overall field increased to 43 entrants; and the
    percentage of unplayable dross decreased again, continuing the trend of the last
    several years.  Even many of the failures this year were honest failures,
    victims of overambition rather than laziness.  Congratulations and thanks go out
    not just to the top finishers and organizer Stephan Granade, but to everyone who
    entered a game, wrote reviews, or merely voted.

    1 Floatpoint, by Emily Short
    2 The Primrose Path, by Nolan Bonvouloir
    3 The Elysium Enigma, by Eric Eve
    4 The Traveling Swordsman, by Mike Snyder (writing as Anonymous)
    5 Moon-Shaped, by Jason Ermer
    6 Delightful Wallpaper, by Andrew Plotkin (writing as Edgar O. Weyrd)
    7 Legion, by Jason Devlin (writing as Ian Anderson)
    8 Madam Spider's Web, by Sara Dee
    9 Mobius, by John Clemens (writing as J.D. Clemens)
    10 Unauthorized Termination, by Richard Otter
    11 Game Producer!, by jason bergman
    12 The Sisters, by revgiblet
    13 Star City, by Mark Sachs
    14 Strange Geometries, by Phillip Chambers
    15 The Tower of the Elephant, by Tor Andersson
    16 Aunts and Butlers, by Robin Johnson
    17 Xen: The Hunt, by Ian Shlasko
    18 Labyrinth, by Samantha Casanova Preuninger
    19 Requiem, by david whyld
    20 Carmen Devine: Supernatural Troubleshooter, by Rob Myall
    21 The Bible Retold, by Justin Morgan and "Celestianpower"
    22 Another Goddamn Escape the Locked Room Game, by Riff Conner
    23 Fight or Flight, by Sean Krauss (writing as geelpete)
    24 MANALIVE, A Mystery of Madness - I, by Bill Powell
    25 Hedge, by Steven Richards
    26 A Broken Man, by Geoff Fortytwo
    27 Polendina, by Christopher Lewis
    28 The Initial State, by Matt Barton
    29 MANALIVE, A Mystery of Madness - II, by Bill Powell
    30 Pathfinder, by Tony Woods
    31 The Apolcalypse Clock, by GlorbWare
    32 Wumpus Run, by Elfindor
    33 Ballymun Adventure, by Brendan Cribbin
    34 Tentellian Island, by Zack Wood (writing as Waru)
    35 Lawn of Love, by Santoonie Corporation
    36 Beam, by Madrone Eddy
    37 Enter the Dark, by Peter R. Shushmaruk
    38 Green Falls, by Paul Panks (writing as Dunric)
    39 Sisyphus, by Theo Koutz
    40 Visocica, by Thorben Burgel
    41 Simple Adventure, by Paul Panks (writing as dunric)
    42 Fetter's Grim, by Paul Panks (writing as Dunric)
    43 PTGOOD 8*10^23, by Sartre Malvolio

    ELECTRONIC LITERATURE COLLECTION, VOLUME 1
    Scott Rettberg of the Electronic Literature Organization was recently kind
    enough to send me a CD of the ELO's first Collection, containing 60 examples of
    many different types of electronic writing.  Most familiar to SPAG readers will
    be the five works of IF included: All Roads by Jon Ingold; Whom the Telling
    Changed by Aaron Reed; Bad Machine by Dan Shiovitz; and Galatea and Savoir Faire
    by Emily Short.  With a hectic holiday season finally behind me, I have just
    begun to delve into the rest of the Collection, and hope to offer more thoughts
    in SPAG's next issue.  For now, though, you can see for yourself at the URL
    below.
    http://collection.eliterature.org/

    IF SEARCH ENGINE
    Ken Franklin has created a customized search engine that pulls from a variety of
    community websites.  Try it out, and be sure to email Ken your suggestions for
    additional sites to be included in the searches.
    http://search.ifstuff.org/

    WESTFIELD CHANDLER PUBLISHING
    Longtime community contributor David Cornelson has decided to make a go at
    producing commercial IF.  His plans have already generated much discussion and
    perhaps even some excitement.  Here's wishing him the best of luck in his
    venture, and commending him for actually doing what so many -- myself included,
    of course -- have merely talked about.  More news about David's new company will
    appear here as it arrives.

    RUSSIAN IF COMPETITION 2006
    The Russian IF Community's annual Competition, featuring six entrants, has
    recently wrapped up.  Those with Russian can find the games here:
    http://www.rtads.org/kril06/

    A BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO INFORM 7
    Brandon Felger has started putting together a new manual to help ease newbies
    into Inform 7 development.  It is available for anyone to add to and improve on
    Wikibooks.
    http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Beginner27s_Guide_to_Interactive_Fiction_with_Infor
    m_7

    FREE IF COVER ART
    Artist Tim Simmons is offering to create IF cover art for anyone's game, for
    free (subject to certain reasonable restrictions, of course).  Visit his website
    to see his work, and to email him about adding that last missing touch to your
    masterpiece.
    http://www.timsimmons.com/

    SPAG NEEDS YOU!
    We cover a lot of ground in this issue, but there are always more, more, more
    games being released that deserve reviews.  Please think about helping out.  The
    following games I am looking for especially, but reviews of virtually any IF,
    old or new, will be gratefully accepted.

    SPAG 10 MOST WANTED LIST
    ========================
    1.  Remaining IF Comp 2006 Games (any or some)
    2.  Getfeldt's Treasure
    3.  1893: A World's Fair Mystery
    4.  Final Selection
    5.  The Retreat
    6.  When in Rome, parts 1 and/or 2
    7.  Bronze
    8.  IntroComp 2006 Games (any, some, or all)
    9.  Moments Out of Time Adventure Type
    10. The Ebb and Flow of the Tide

    A EULOGY FOR STAR FOSTER by Daniel Ravipinto-------------------------------

    [Most of us in the IF community know Star Foster as the co-author with Daniel
    Ravipinto of 2003's Competition winner Slouching Towards Bedlam, one of the most
    played and discussed IF works of the last five years.  It is too easy to forget,
    though, that there is much more to the people behind IF than the games they
    create, that IF is just an enjoyable hobby and distraction from real life for
    most of us.  Here then is Dan's tribute to Star Foster the human being, who
    passed away on December 10, 2006. --JM]

    There are no words to sum up the life of Star Foster, but words are all I have.
    Words, and stories, and anecdotes and small slices of fact assembled into some
    whole that will, of course, come far from encompassing who she really was, and
    how much her passing will leave us without.

    But words are a start.

    So much of Star's life was a love affair with the written word.  Both words in
    the abstract, their meanings, ideas, etymology, and words as physical, living
    things.  She loved the sound, shape and tone of a turn of phrase, the feel and
    smell of books.  She loved words as vibrant, living things existing at the
    intersection of mind and body, the cognitive and the emotional.

    She read voraciously and never alone.  She was a member of a monthly book club
    and was always lending and borrowing books with her friends, always ready to
    share another new favorite.

    Writing (though not the writing process) was her passion, but she never thought
    she wrote enough and she never thought of herself as a 'real' writer.  She was
    wrong about that, as she was wrong about few things.

    It's not surprising that she was endlessly delighted at the success of Slouching
    Towards Bedlam, her first foray into interactive-fiction, for it meant she could
    truthfully call herself an award-winning writer.

    Slouching was in many ways an intersection of many of Star's passions: Victorian
    language and society, weird and interesting technology, language and meaning,
    and most importantly, a solid story. Star had always been fascinated with games,
    especially those that told tales.  As a child, when she couldn't find anyone to
    join her in playing Dark Tower (one of the first electronic board games ever
    made), she sat alone in her room for hours, imagining adventures between the
    canned noises and the blinks of LEDs.

    Of interactive-fiction, she once wrote, "It's a phenomenal art form, full of
    creative possibilities, that allows a truly intimate exchange between the writer
    and the player. Too often these games are shadowed by their graphic-rich
    cousins, many of which can't be bothered with intricate details like plot,
    pacing, and story. Interactive fiction is more than just another kind of game;
    it's another kind of literature."

    Literature was one of the lenses through which Star viewed the world.

    Another was the lens of her camera.

    She loved Philadelphia, her life-long home, as I have seen few places loved. She
    knew the city inside and out, and yet was always discovering new secrets, new
    surprises which she shared at every opportunity.

    During her many winsome wanderings around the city she would take photos of
    whatever caught her eye: doorways, statues, gravestones, historical sites, and
    even hastily taped-up flyers admonishing the viewer to vote for John Kerry.

    She'd post them on her blog (www.SarcasmosCorner.com), and to a long-time city
    dweller these places were usually familiar, yet through her lens they seemed
    somehow new.

    Again, Star never did anything in a vacuum.  The most important part of her
    journey was the sharing: the stories and anecdotes told afterwards.  Her stories
    were always a part of her community, told to her family and friends as she
    encouraged them to share their own.

    Star found adventure everywhere.

    She once wrote a children's novel for National Novel Writing Month about a boy
    who steps through a small door in his school and finds adventures on the other
    side.  Star was fascinated with doors, always curious about where they led,
    about what was on the other side.

    I've since come to learn that these doors, constructed to provide access to
    ductwork and plumbing, are called "trouble doors", and they were a perfect
    fascination and metaphor for a woman for whom safe was never quite good enough.

    Star had more stories and more adventures than anyone I've ever known.  She'd
    been a pirate and scream queen.  She'd joined a secret society just to find out
    what they did.  She'd been to Japan.  She'd gone swimming with sharks.  She'd
    sung in a piano bar in a boa.

    Star knew where all the trouble doors in life were, and although she sometimes
    doubted, worried, and was scared, none of that stopped her from venturing
    through them.

    And I was sometimes lucky enough to go along with her.

    On December 10, 2006, Star Foster stepped through another door, and this time I
    can't follow. I hope that someday, when my adventures are over, I'll meet her on
    the other side and find her, waiting and impatient, with more stories, more
    adventures.

    More words.

    A TIMELINE OF THE FRENCH IF COMMUNITY by Eriorg----------------------------

    [French IF received a big boost in profile with the recent release of Ekphrasis,
    an ambitious and lengthy multimedia adventure.  (See Felix Plesoianu's review in
    this issue.)  The French community is young and still quite small, but has grown
    steadily in recent years.  As the first of what I hope will turn into a regular
    series of features on the "other" IF communities, French community member Eriorg
    here provides a timeline of modern French IF history. --JM]

    1980s and very early 1990s: Many IF games in French, both commercial and
    freeware, were released, although most of them had graphics but rather primitive
    parsers. (Note that the modern French IF community has little or nothing to do
    with the French IF of the commercial era: present French-speaking IF authors are
    influenced by modern English IF games.)

    Late 1991 (probably): The last commercial French (parser-based) IF game.

    c. 1993: The last freeware French IF game of that era.

    c. 1994 -- 1999: As far as I know, there was absolutely no French IF activity at
    all during all those years.

    2000 (at the latest): A mailing list about Inform in French was created.

    January 2001: JL Pontico released the French translation of Inform, and also
    "Aventure", a translation of "Adventure".

    2002: Eric Forgeot began his first game, "Le pouvoir délaissé : The coming race
    II", written with Glulx Inform. (Unfortunately, it's still an incomplete demo
    version. Apparently, he now hopes to release it in 2007.)

    2002: Sabine, whose website (http://fa1ckg.free.fr/) is about games in French
    which are accessible for visually impaired people (not only IF), released her
    first French translations of short Inform English IF games.

    February 2003: A very important date, because of the release of "Filaments" (by
    JB), the first original (i.e. not a translation) and finished game of the modern
    French IF community. It was a long story, full of adventure and humor, taking
    place in Paris and in a variety of surreal places. The same year, an Italian
    translation (by Marco Totolo) of this game was very well received and even won
    the Best Italian IF game of the year 2003 award!

    July 2004: Release of "La Mort Pour Seul Destin", again by JB. It was a non-
    linear fantasy IF game with RPG elements, and also a homage to adventure
    gamebooks, especially Steve Jackson's "Sorcery!" series.

    August 2004: The mailing list was replaced by a web forum
    (http://ifiction.free.fr/forumBB/index.php).

    April 7, 2005: Stab, a computer artist (who is also the author of the French
    Comp 2005 and 2006 logos and of the look of the French IF forum) suggested the
    idea of a French IF short games competition.

    April 16, 2005: Eric Forgeot announced the competition and its rules. He was the
    organizer of the comp.

    FRENCH COMP 2005 RULES:
    - Any programming language may be used.
    - The theme is: a main puzzle which, when it'll be solved, will end or nearly
    end the story. This puzzle might be about mechanisms or gearings, for instance.
    - The deadline is June 21st. (It was later postponed until September 30th.)
    - Three ratings, each one from 1 to 10. The three criteria are: "enjoyment",
    "originality and atmosphere" and "technical quality". The general average will
    determine the winner. There will also be a winner in each category.
    - Authors may judge the games -- except their own games, of course! (We're just
    not numerous enough to refuse votes. In the French Comp, Eric Forgeot even is
    simultaneously the organizer, an author and a judge!)
    - Authors must be anonymous.
    - Authors may submit several games if they want.

    Note that the French Comp rules were always very flexible: we're quite glad if
    you submit games, we can't be too fussy if you don't quite respect some rules.
    For instance, the theme of the comp is optional: it's supposed to help you to
    find ideas, not to be a constraint.
    Similarly, games whose authors were not anonymous were accepted. Anyway, the
    rule about anonymity doesn't really work in practice: with so few authors, it's
    not that hard to guess who's who!
    No rule forbids to submit already released games.
    Finally, both the submitting and the voting deadline were often postponed in
    order to allow latecomers to enter.

    Late September and early October 2005: the competition games were released.
    There were five games, by five different authors. Two of them were the first
    French games written with ADRIFT, which Sabine had recently translated into
    French.

    October 26, 2005: French Comp 2005 results:
    1. "Le Cercle des Gros Geeks disparus" by Adrien Saurat (a humorous one-room
    game)
       (Also winner of Best enjoyment and Best technical quality.)

    2. "Echappée Belle Dans les Contrées du Rêve" by JB (a Lovecraftian story)
       (Winner of Best originality and atmosphere.)

    3. "Le Temple de Feu" by Eric Forgeot (a puzzle-filled game)
    4. "Les Feux de l'enfer" by Sabine (a fantasy story)
    5. "Qui a tué Dana ?" by Vegeta (a mystery story with a touch of science
    fiction)

    To sum up, with the French Comp, the principle of competitions for short IF
    games proved once again, ten years after the creation of the IF Comp in the
    English community, its remarkable effectiveness to motivate authors to write
    games and ABOVE ALL to finish them -- rather than procrastinate or start big
    projects which never get finished...

    April and May 2006: Benjamin Roux released two homebrewed MS-DOS games on the IF
    Archive, "Interra, L'autre monde" and "Jour pluvieux".

    2006: Loïc released two games, which he submitted to the French Comp a bit
    later.

    Late October 2006: the French Comp 2006 games (four games by three authors) were
    released.

    Same rules as French Comp 2005, except:
    - The suggested theme was science fiction.
    - Ratings: the three criteria were slightly different from the previous comp:
    "enjoyment", "writing" and "programming". The "enjoyment" criterion had a double
    weight for the calculation of the average.
    - There were a few prizes, donated by JB. (There was no prize in the previous
    French Comp.)

    November 3, 2006: JB released "Ekphrasis", a very ambitious game with many
    graphics, sounds and music. It's an adventure story about forgers and
    Renaissance art. Although it's in French, it already received a few very
    favorable reactions on the RGIF newsgroup.

    December 29, 2006: French Comp 2006 results:

    "La Cité des Eaux" by Adrien Saurat: 1st place.
    (Also winner of Best writing, Best programming and Best enjoyment.)
    -------------------------
    A post-apocalyptic science fiction game. After a journey through various
    devastated places, you might reach "la Cité des Eaux" (the City of Waters). On
    the way, you, as a player, will progressively discover the not so pleasant
    nature of the player character's personality and mission...

    "Sarvegne" by Eric Forgeot: 2nd place.
    -------------------------
    A science fiction game. You're about to enter the futuristic city of Sarvegne,
    where you want to meet a pen-friend who asked you to come there...

    "Largo Winch" by Loïc: 3rd place.
    -------------------------
    An adventure story inspired by the successful comic books series of the same
    name. (According to a page (http://www.largowinch.com/fr/bd/moi5_11.html) from
    the official Largo Winch website, they apparently rather encourage fanfiction.)
    You're Largo Winch, the director of the "Group W" and one of the richest men in
    the world, but also a man of action. There have been two murders in one of your
    Mexican research laboratories, the W Food Research laboratory. You go there to
    investigate personally...

    "Enquête à hauts risques" by Loïc: 4th place.
    -------------------------
    A thriller taking place in Paris nowadays. You're a policeman called Lucas
    Label, and today might be the day you'll send at last to jail Roberto Amato, one
    of the most dangerous men of the Italian Mafia. But things might also go
    terribly wrong!

    All the same, the French-speaking IF community is still very small, with hardly
    more than a dozen permanent members. This causes many problems: few games, few
    players (which perhaps makes it harder to find the motivation to write games,
    and probably also makes games less technically solid than they could be, because
    of the lack of beta-testers), and so on.

    We'd give new members a very warm reception!

    THE SPAG INTERVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH STUDIES)--------------------------

    Eriorg was kind enough to conduct and translate interviews for SPAG with two of
    the French community's most prominent members: Adrien Saurat, winner of the
    recent French IF Competition; and JB, author of the recently released multimedia
    epic Ekphrasis that has gotten considerable attention even in the English IF
    community.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     Adrien Saurat, author of "La Cité des Eaux"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      E: Let's begin with the usual SPAG interview introductory question:
      could you tell us a little about yourself? Who are you, what do you do
      for a living, and so on?

    AS: I'm Adrien Saurat, 28 years old French semi-geek. I work as an engineer in a
    big Information Technology service firm, working mostly with ASP and PHP
    languages. Aside from that, I enjoy playing comedy theatre in general and
    improvisational theatre in particular.

      E: How did you know about IF in general, and French IF in particular?

    AS: My very first contact with IF was with a game I don't really remember... I
    was very young and it was in English, I didn't understand everything. I only
    remember that it was somehow related to Alice in Wonderland. I had a good time
    on this but soon got back to Nebulus, Bubble Bobble and such! Later, I
    discovered the Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy and Planetfall. I got really
    into Planetfall, and this little robot is still in my mind after all these
    years. But again, after trying this game I got back to more action-oriented
    games.

    A few years ago, after reading the Douglas Adams books, I played the H2G2 game
    again and tried to find French Interactive Fictions of the same kind. I soon
    discovered the mailing-list dedicated to French IF creation, downloaded the
    Inform translation by Jean-Luc Pontico and created a portal to host the
    community, which is now mostly administrated and updated by Eric Forgeot. In
    2005, Stab (our graphic artist) and Eric initiated the French Comp, and we since
    enjoy to make it live in spite of the tiny number of authors we have!

      E: I see that, besides interactive fiction, you're also interested by e-mail
      role-playing games: what are they, exactly? Did you create some yourself? And
      do you think there are things in common between IF games and e-mail RPGs?

    AS: I got into this after two years of online RPG gaming on Ultima Online and
    The 4th Coming. At first lurking on an English "Red Dwarf" based e-mail rpg, I
    soon tried one of them in French. This game quickly vanished, so I started my
    own, a sci-fi humorous game in which I did put the character of my first
    player in a spaceship, brush in hands :)

    To me, pbem games (play by e-mail) represent the best form of online gaming if
    you enjoy freedom of action. It combines the possibilities of a good old live
    role-playing game with the advantages of playing when you have the time to do so
    (my good old Warhammer Saturday afternoons with my friends definitely belong to
    the past). Then, when you want to create games for a greater audience, the
    closest choice is the Interactive Fiction! You can still develop a rich story
    and give the player a rather good feeling of freedom (at least better than in
    point-and-click games), with this "anyone can do it" feeling (I just can't make
    a Monkey Island for now).

      E: How did you have the idea of "La Cité des Eaux"? And did the suggested
      themes for the French Comp (in 2006, it was science fiction) help you to find
      ideas or were they, on the contrary, constraints?

    AS: The science fiction theme has always been one of my favorite, so in no way
    could it be a constraint. I just had to choose among all my influences in this
    domain... Asimov? Lucas? Orwell? Adams? Barjavel?

    "La Cité des Eaux" (post-apocalyptic) was in fact my third idea for the comp. My
    two first projects would fit in the "Space Opera" genre. One of them is still a
    work in progress, but it was too big to be finished on time. It will be largely
    inspired by space trading games like Elite or Nomad, but I really can't say when
    it will be finished... I'm used to small games and they already consume a lot of
    my time ;)

    Too late for that, I had to find another idea. I'm fond of post-apocalyptic
    settings, and one of my favorite authors of the 19th century wrote a sort-of
    prophetical text which really shines by its cold and cruel modernity. I soon got
    excited about using this long quote in a game, and started a story which takes
    place in a ravaged world, slowly curing from its wounds.

      E: A major theme of "La Cité des Eaux" is the opposition between nature and
      man, between ecology and technology. What's your opinion about that subject?
      Do you entirely disapprove of the attitude of the main character of the game,
      or do you nevertheless agree a little with him, somehow?

    AS: Ahem... I spent a lot of time during the last years to re-think my vision of
    Life, the Universe and Everything. I ended up being a deterministic, somewhat
    nihilistic (I don't kill people), atheist. Still, I can't decide between "Let's
    save our Earth, for our children's sake!" and "In the end, everything will
    disappear anyway, life is absurd, so who cares?"

    The game tries to give an intermediate solution!

    I can't say I agree with the main character, but the goal of the game is clearly
    to help him achieve his mission. The happy end was only added to enhance
    replayability and to reassure people about my sanity ;-) but the story is
    designed in such a way that most players will first finish it with the initial
    goal (except maybe for experienced players who can't stop snuffing everywhere).

      E: In "La Cité des Eaux", there are many quotations from a famous French
      writer (we won't reveal his name here to avoid spoilers). What gave you this
      idea? Is he one of your favorite authors? Or perhaps did you choose him just
      because his texts are in the public domain?

    AS: Yes, he shares the top of my favorite authors with Albert Camus, Jerome K
    Jerome and Douglas Adams!

    The quotes used in the game come from a short, simple and underrated book of
    this author. I read it regularly when I feel my muse gets lazy!
    Thinking of the precedent question, I can add that the 19th century quotation is
    only closed when you attain the regular ending. It just wouldn't fit with the
    happy one.

      E: Before "La Cité des Eaux", you published the game "Le Cercle des Gros Geeks
      disparus", the French Comp 2005 winner. Could you present it shortly? And
      which one of your two games do you personally prefer?

    AS: The title refers to "Le cercle des poètes disparus", aka "Dead poets
    society" in English. Thinking about it, "Dead geeks society" would make it very
    well for a translation of the game ;-) In this fiction, you play the role of a
    nerd waking up after a whole night of drinking lemonade-based cocktails and
    crafting a mysterious cube. Your goal is to finish this WIP machine with the
    items you'll find in the bedroom. Depending on which objects you'll plug on the
    cube, it will have a totally different usage and that will generate specific
    endings, only one of them being totally satisfying.

    "Le Cercle" is a very short and, I hope, fun game. I took the time to implement
    nearly everything I wanted. I still have a version in progress to correct the
    last bugs, and of course it's far from perfect and I could enhance it, but
    otherwise I consider the game finished.

    On the other hand, "La Cité des Eaux" was really completed in a hurry and some
    rooms are very very empty. That makes me mad and if you, reader, wants to try
    the game, please wait for the Release 4, coming soon in French, or the Release
    5, which should be an English version.

    I prefer "La Cité des Eaux" for two reasons. First, the theme seems more
    interesting to me. Second, I like the fact that the player can drive the
    character in some places just to change his vision of the world, thus modifying
    the ending.

      E: Although the atmosphere of your two games is totally different, they do
      have at least one notable thing in common: the presence of multiple endings,
      only one of them optimal, which enhances replayability. Do you particularly
      like that way of doing things, rather than, for instance, longer but more
      linear games with only one winning ending?

    AS: When I was a child, playing 8 bits games for hours and hours, I had a
    sadistic patience and could play on a single, complex and undocumented game for
    days (we all did, didn't we?). That's over! I don't play often now, and I prefer
    short and easy games, simply to spend a good time in a virtual world. I create
    the games I'd like to play. The multiple endings in "Le Cercle des Geeks" are
    simple to find. They may be fun but do not add a lot to the meaning of the story
    (talk about meaning with geeks involved...). In "La Cité des Eaux", the end
    depends on the morale and philanthropy of the main character, which changes
    during the game depending on the actions asked by the player. In the Release 2,
    sent for the comp, the tuning is far from perfect, but later versions will add
    more endings and make them more tied to the state of the character.

    Well, yes, I like this kind of play! I was largely influenced by games like
    Aisle, Pick up the phone booth and die, Galatea... but wanted to push the
    experience in a longer story. My future games will still probably offer multiple
    endings, maybe even branching stories.

      E: What are your favorite IF games?

    AS: Amongst the classics, Planetfall for ever!

    Speaking about the modern creations, I must admit that I didn't play a lot of
    games but I can mention I-0, Being Andrew Plotkin and All Roads which really
    pleased me, each one in its special style (I-0 rules!).

    My favorite French game is Filaments, written by JB Ferrant, a beautiful story
    about a young Parisian girl called Margot and his dorky friend Jonas.

      E: How do you see the future of French IF?

    AS: Our community gets slowly bigger and bigger. Some of us make a lot of
    efforts to enhance the visibility of our community and it should pay soon. We
    are happy to approach the English community now, but our biggest priority is
    still to gain more writers and players in French speaking countries. A very long
    task which should be made easier by crafting a few newbie friendly games. Maybe
    Ekphrasis could fill this empty spot with its multimedia content? Future will
    tell.

      E: What are your projects (especially related to IF!), now?

    AS: I'm working on a seafaring game which should be bigger than La Cité des
    Eaux, but still largely influenced by the choices of the player (way more, in
    fact). It will be more action oriented, and should be an intermediate step
    before the Elite-like game I spoke about earlier.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     JB, author of "Ekphrasis"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      E: The usual SPAG interview introductory question: could you tell us a little
      about yourself? Who are you, what do you do for a living, and so on?

    JB: I'm JB, with a very full life, and lots of stories to relate.

      E: How did you know about IF in general, and French IF in particular?

    JB: I came upon "Aisle" by chance in 2002 and I was charmed by that surprising
    game. I then discovered the INFORM language, and its French version, but there
    was no original game in French at the time. I found it interesting to embark on
    this adventure, and a few months later, Filaments was written.

      E: I see that you're also a writer and that you've published a novel,
      "Perfect!" (http://ginko968.free.fr/histoires/index.htm). Could you tell us
      more about it? And does your writing experience help you for your IF games,
      and vice versa?

    JB: The creation of Perfect was a publishing rather than a writing project: it
    was a novella about video games published on a website which had been very
    successful; we created a label (Ginko), requested an ISBN, did the legal deposit
    at the Ministry of the Interior and at the National Library of France, worked
    out the bar code representing the ISBN, made a normalized cover, and so on...

    It's difficult to launch into an IF without taking pleasure in writing, but an
    accomplished writer, while he'll know how to delight us with a spirited
    scenario, solid characters and tangible descriptions, won't guarantee an
    interactive game giving the intellectual pleasure of a true video game; a double
    culture, about both adventure games and literature, is a prerequisite for that
    exercise.

      E: About your new game "Ekphrasis": what gave you the idea of writing a story
      about Renaissance art? Do you have a passion for this subject?

    JB: I wanted to write a story dealing with experts in a particular subject, a
    priori austere and rigorous as art history and mathematics are for the novices,
    and make characters with strong personalities contrast with these austere
    subjects. The rest was only documentation, the Renaissance era being so rich
    that everything can be a pretext to fascinating stories.

      E: "Ekphrasis" is your first game with graphics, sounds and music. In your
      opinion, what can these multimedia elements add to IF games? Should they be
      above all illustrations, beautiful but optional, or do you prefer, like
      sometimes in "Ekphrasis", that they're really essential for the game, for
      instance to solve some puzzles?

    JB: By their dryness, IF games play with the obscure part of imagination and the
    addition of multimedia elements may be a neither necessary nor desirable
    evolution.

    The illustrations aren't optional: Ekphrasis is written in the first person, and
    what Gilbert Fontenelle the art history professor sees isn't what the player
    must see in order to progress; more precisely, what Gilbert sees is expressed by
    the text, whereas the picture gives a more objective vision. For instance, in
    the first room, the description mentions Bramante and the "formidable presence"
    of the Renaissance masters, but the picture explains more clearly where the
    player is.

    Similarly, when you observe some objects, for instance the fax you receive at
    the beginning of the game, the information appears in the graphic window, and
    there's an ironic comment from Gilbert in the text part, which provides a
    particularly pleasant to handle writing liberty.

    By extension, the sounds are there to underline an atmosphere, and the (brief)
    music, to sanction a chapter and to set a tone.

    As for the possibility of exploiting pictures or sounds to devise new puzzles,
    why not, but the quality of puzzles, the clarity of their formulation and the
    cleverness of their solution and the resulting game enjoyment are only a problem
    of design, not of implementation.

      E: Could you tell us (no need to go into all the details!) which illustrations
      and sounds of "Ekphrasis" did you do yourself and which ones were you able to
      take elsewhere, for example on websites with royalty-free pictures and sounds?

    JB: I dug into my archives and family archives, as well as in a bought image
    bank CD. On that subject, you'll find again some characters from Ekphrasis in
    various advertisements of bad quality...

      E: Did the programming of the game with Glulx happen without too many
      difficulties?

    JB: Problems which now seem minor to me: obsolete compiler, the save function,
    and also the "Demander" ("Ask") verb didn't work in the French libraries until a
    recent correction was implemented.

    Finally, until the OGG was implemented in Glulx, Ekphrasis very nearly was a
    silent game...

      E: You're already the author of 4 IF games in French : "Filaments", "La Mort
      Pour Seul Destin", "Échappée Belle dans les Contrées du Rêve" and of course
      "Ekphrasis". Which one do you personally prefer? Which one was best received
      by the players? Do you have an estimate of the number of people who played at
      least one of your games, as far as you know?

    JB: My favorite is the one I'm going to write soon ;-) Although I received
    laudatory e-mails concerning Ekphrasis, Filaments received an extremely warm
    welcome at the time and I still regularly receive e-mails (from an exclusively
    feminine audience, by the way) on that subject even 4 years later.

    For your information, on January 6, 2007 and since it was put online on November
    3, 2006, Ekphrasis was downloaded 3037 times as its Windows stand-alone
    executable version and 1696 times as its .blb version for other operating
    systems from my website.

    Now, I don't know how many people played it. Note that these numbers are below
    the downloads of "La Mort Pour Seul Destin", which goes to show that, when
    you've got a good title...

      E: You've already made, and finished!, 4 games (3 of them quite long), which
      is unusual for French IF! What's your "secret"?

    JB: I'm haunted by stories which only want to express themselves.

      E: "Filaments" was translated into Italian and, by the way, won the Best
      Italian game of the year 2003 award. In what circumstances did it happen? Do
      you think that there'll be other translations of your games, for instance an
      English translation of "Ekphrasis"?

    JB: Shortly after the release of Filaments, an enthusiastic bilingual player
    intended to make a translation of it. Given that he was also a good programmer,
    it's not impossible that the Italian version is more pleasant to play, too...

    Of course, it would always be a pleasure for me that Ekphrasis or another one
    would be translated into English so that these characters are known by a larger
    audience, but I wouldn't be personally proactive on those projects, translation
    being a project requiring a rigor, a competence and a passion I don't think I
    have.

      E: What are your favorite IF games?

    JB: Aisle, Shrapnel, All Roads.

      E: How do you see the future of French IF?

    JB: Our community is enriched with about one permanent member every year,
    therefore rather well ;-)

      E: What are your projects (especially related to IF!), now?

    JB: I'm presently working on a new project, which has even more pictures, with a
    bigger graphic window, and more sounds.

    THE SPAG INTERVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH STUDIES)--------------------------

    Per long tradition, presented here are interviews with the top three finishers
    from the 12th Annual IF Competition: third place finisher Eric Eve; second place
    finisher Nolan Bonvouloir; and the 2006 Competition winner, Emily Short.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     Eric Eve, author of "The Elysium Enigma"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      SPAG: You have been a prominent member of the community for a couple of years
      now, but this marks your first interview for SPAG.  I understand you are a New
      Testament scholar when not authoring IF.  Care to share with us a bit about
      your personal and professional life outside IF?

    EE: As you say, I'm a New Testament scholar; I work at Harris Manchester
    College, which is one of the colleges of Oxford University. But Harris
    Manchester is an unusual Oxford college in that we take only mature students,
    i.e. students who are 21 or over at the start of their course, so I get to teach
    people from a wide variety of backgrounds. I've also spent four Januaries
    teaching Winter Term courses at Middlebury College in Vermont.

    I wasn't always an NT scholar, though. My first degree was in Engineering, and I
    worked for EMI Electronics for 15 months before being lured into the family
    business where I stayed for 15 years. Early in the nineties a series of
    takeovers persuaded me that it was time for me and a business career to part
    company, so I returned to Oxford to retrain as an academic.

      SPAG: The thing that always strikes me first about your games is your mastery
      of NPC interaction.  Conversations in your games feel more real than those in
      just about any other IF.  How do you get this effect?  Any secrets you can
      share, other than just patience and an intimate knowledge of TADS 3?

    EE: Thank you for your kind remarks! If the conversations in my games do work
    well, it's probably due to a number of factors. First, I've had some practice at
    writing dialogue in my drafts of (unpublished) static fiction.  Second, I've
    generally tried to follow the advice Mike Roberts's article on creating dynamic
    characters, for example in giving both sides to the conversation and in varying
    default responses. Third, I do try to take full advantage of the tools TADS 3
    provides for programming conversations and other aspects of NPC implementation.
    But fourth, as you suggest, it does take a great deal of patience, in providing
    a reasonably wide range of responses, in trying to ensure that the responses
    vary appropriately according to circumstance, and in polishing the dialogue in
    the light of how it appears on the screen in the course of play-testing (both my
    own and my beta-testers'). There's no magic secret to it, but I think it does
    help to think in terms of writing dialogue and not just responses to
    conversational commands; in particular when I'm writing a series of responses to
    the same command I'm usually trying to imagine how a conversation on the topic
    might progress, while trying to allow for the fact that the player might enter
    other commands in between any of the conversational exchanges.

      EE: You constructed your game in such a way that it is possible to reach the
      ending with as few as 12 of its 30 points.  The game thus fits within the
      Competition time limit, yet offers much more for those interested in
      exploring.  It even concludes with customized hints on things one might want
      to try next time through.  How did you come up with this approach?

    EE: To be honest, I was a bit worried whether it would fit within the time
    limit. I suppose it was partly this worry that led to the approach you mention;
    I wanted to make it reasonably possible for most players to find an ending
    within two hours, while giving scope to the other ideas I'd thought up. I also
    wanted to provide more puzzle-oriented players with more things to do without
    this obligatory for all. So far as the customized hints at the end are
    concerned, this simply struck me as a neat idea to implement when I was
    considering what to put in an AMUSING option. Of course I also hoped it might
    encourage some players to play the game again outside the Comp to find some of
    the things they missed first time round.

      SPAG: From the department of strange coincidences: Two of top three finishers
      this year had amazingly similar themes, although their individual feels are
      quite different.  Were you surprised when you realized that Floatpoint also
      involved a diplomat visiting a backwater colony inhabited by strange and
      possibly dangerous natives?

    EE: Yes, I was indeed, and remarked on it shortly after playing Floatpoint in an
    email exchange with Emily Short. As you say, the two games have a very different
    feel, but another coincidental similarity is that in both games the PC's first
    explicit task is to meet a particular official. Moreover, in both games the
    native society is facing extinction, though for very different reasons, and in
    both games the PC in a sense has to deal with threats to the native society,
    though in very different ways. Some of these similarities may be rather too
    general to be significant, but none of them is due to Emily and I exchanging
    ideas before the Comp.

      SPAG: You mention in Elysium Enigma that it is just one fairly small episode
      in a science fiction universe you have been building for three decades (!).  I
      am reminded of J.R.R. Tolkien, filling his office with maps, legends, and even
      languages of a world no one else knew existed. Will we be seeing more of this
      universe, in either IF or static fiction?

    EE: I have no concrete plans right now for another IF game set in this universe,
    but it's quite possible I'll return to it in some future game. I doubt the
    static fiction set in this universe will appear in print any time in the
    foreseeable future. Every now and again I come back to it and have another go at
    polishing it, but it's nowhere near anything that would be publishable. There
    are currently six or seven novels in the series, in various states of disarray,
    and every time I polish one up it changes my ideas about what should be in the
    others; and none of them has reached a quality I'd feel happy to have my name
    attached to in print.

      SPAG: In addition to your game authorship, you have also been deeply involved
      in the development of TADS 3, even authoring a couple of manuals for the
      system.  How did this come about, and has it been a satisfying experience?

    EE: I'm not sure I was exactly "deeply involved in the development of TADS 3";
    in common with many other member of the TADS 3 list I've bombarded Mike Roberts
    with bug reports and feature requests, and there's a couple of small bits of the
    library that are based on things I sent Mike, but the real development effort is
    down to him. But it is true that I have contributed some documentation. This
    originally came about through my own efforts to learn the system with little
    more than the system documentation and the comments in the library code to guide
    me. Once I'd more or less begun to understand the basics I thought it would be
    helpful to write the sort of guide I would have found useful as a complete
    beginner coming from another system (I originally learned Inform 6), and so I
    drafted the original "Getting Started in TADS 3" as one fairly recent beginner
    trying to help totally new beginners. Mike gave me a lot of useful feedback on
    the first draft, which prevented it passing on too many near-beginner mistakes.
    But there was a great deal the Getting Started Guide didn't cover, so after
    spending more time working in TADS 3 I conceived the idea of writing a Tour
    Guide that would take the reader through most of the more commonly-used library
    classes in a reasonably systematic manner. Mike subsequently asked me whether he
    could distribute the Getting Started Guide and the Tour Guide as part of the
    documentation for the official release of TADS 3 and I was very happy for him to
    do so; quite apart from anything else it meant that all the work I'd put into
    writing them would be put to good use!

    In the main I'd say it was a satisfying experience. I've certainly enjoyed
    participating in the TADS 3 list and knocking around ideas for new features
    during the development process. I'm not satisfied that the Getting Started Guide
    and Tour Guide are as good as they could be, but then I probably wouldn't be
    satisfied with them whatever I'd written, and I'm pleased that people generally
    seem to find them useful. I was also pleased that the incorporation of the
    Getting Started Guide into the official TADS 3 documentation set gave me the
    opportunity to make some fairly major changes to it along lines I'd long been
    contemplating. On the other hand I keep kicking myself when daft errors come to
    light as a result of my not having carried through all the changes consistently.

      SPAG: You are also one of the few, possibly the only, IF author to have
      authored games in both TADS 3 and Inform 7.  I surmise based on my limited
      experience that Inform 7 is easier to pick up, particularly for non-
      programmers, and pitched as a more explicitly literary system; while TADS 3 is
      more technically daunting but has a world model of a complexity never seen
      before in IF, thus making it a better choice for more simulation-oriented
      works.  Would you say this is an accurate assessment?  Can you tell us a bit
      about your experiences with the two systems?  Will you continue to split your
      development time between the two?

    EE: Your characterization of the differences between TADS 3 and Inform 7 may
    need a few qualifications. Inform 7 certainly seems to be attracting a number of
    potential authors who would be daunted by a more conventional programming
    language. Whether that means it's objectively easier to master than TADS 3 I'm
    not so sure. In some ways the TADS 3 language is actually simpler than Inform 7
    (in the sense of involving fewer fundamental concepts); the greater complexity
    of TADS 3 lies in its library. Which of the two systems is easier to pick up
    depends on the inclinations, tastes and previous experience of whoever's trying
    to learn them. To write a very basic game with a few rooms and a couple of
    portable objects is trivially easy in either system; to attain mastery in either
    system is decidedly non-trivial.

    Your contrast between "explicitly literary" and having a complex world model
    suitable for "more simulation-oriented works" may also need qualifying.
    "Explicitly literary" is a fair designation of Inform 7 if and only if it refers
    to the coding style or is taken as indicating one kind of author Inform 7 might
    particularly attract (those significantly more comfortable with crafting prose
    than with coding). This is very different from saying that games written in
    Inform 7 are automatically likely to be more literary than those written in TADS
    3 (which I suspect isn't what you meant); that's down to the literary skills of
    the authors, not the nature of the authoring systems they use.

    Which system is better for simulation-oriented works depends on what it is you
    want to simulate. It's true that TADS 3 comes with a richer world model in its
    standard library, but the world model features TADS 3 adds over and above the
    leaner world model of Inform 7 may or may not be relevant to a particular game.
    The interesting simulations in a work of IF often arise from the author's
    customization of the default library behavior, and both systems allow that.
    When I wrote an Inform 7 demo version of the opening of my TADS 3 game "All Hope
    Abandon" I found that constructing the physical environment and customizing it
    for puzzles was generally no harder in Inform 7 than it had been in TADS 3. This
    may be because I'd already done the hard work in TADS 3, and then simply had to
    translate the same logic into Inform 7 rather than devise it from scratch, but
    whatever the reason most of the physical-world simulation aspects of the opening
    of AHA proved no more difficult to implement in Inform 7 than in TADS 3, and
    certain features of Inform 7, such as its scenes mechanism, made certain tasks
    easier.

    That's far from being the whole story. There are a number of features, such as
    actor postures, multiple lighting levels, sense passing, the ability to locate
    objects behind or under other objects, and the provision of default room parts
    for indoor and outdoor rooms that are standard in the TADS 3 world model but not
    in Inform 7. All these can help lend simulation depth when used well, but I
    think the most significant differences between the systems lies elsewhere.

    By far the most important of these is the marvelous set of tools TADS 3 provides
    for implementing NPCs (including, but not restricted to, the conversation
    interface). Of course one can produce similar effects in other systems; for
    example I wrote a conversation extension for Inform 7 to simulate the TADS 3
    conversation system used in the opening of AHA, and it works well enough for the
    purpose. But my Inform 7 extension lacks a great deal of the functionality of
    the TADS 3 original, and is a lot klunkier to use. At least for me, TADS 3's NPC
    toolset puts it way ahead of the competition for implementing  NPCs of the kind
    I tried to put in Square Circle, All Hope Abandon, and the Elysium Enigma; on
    the other hand my Inform 7 game Dreadwine had much simpler NPCs that were no
    problem to program in Inform 7. Again, I suspect Inform 7 could encourage
    experimenting with NPC sophistication taken in directions different from the
    TADS 3 model, as several of Emily Short's I7 examples illustrate.

    There are also a number of subtler differences between Inform 7 and TADS 3.  For
    example TADS 3 has a rather more sophisticated parser that makes it much easier
    for a game author to fine-tune disambiguation and the like; it also has a rather
    neater way of handling and reporting implicit actions. Again, TADS 3 makes it
    rather easier than Inform 7 to split your game code over a large number of
    source files, which I find extremely useful for large projects. Conversely,
    Inform 7 has a number of neat features like path-finding and units built in.

    So, overall, yes, I'm rather more comfortable doing sophisticated and complex
    things in TADS 3 than in Inform 7, but that's partly because I've have a good
    deal more experience with TADS 3, and may also partly have to do with the way my
    brain happens to work. I also find a lot to like about Inform 7, and would like
    to do more with it in the future. So, to respond to the final part of your
    question, yes, I'd like to continue to use both systems, but I'll probably be
    spending more time with TADS 3, not least because it's my system of choice for
    more substantial projects. Inform 7 felt ideal for a short game like Dreadwine,
    and I'd probably use it again for a project on that sort of scale (or indeed for
    another game like Swineback Ridge, which I wrote in Inform 6, but subsequently
    translated into I7 as a learning exercise).

      SPAG: Did you get a chance to play the other entries in the Competition?  Any
      impressions to offer?  Favorites?

    EE: I played nearly all the comp games, apart from those that I couldn't get to
    run or that weren't in English; that's not to say that I allowed the games I
    really didn't like to detain me long. The three games I voted for in the Miss
    Congeniality were Madam Spider's Web, Floatpoint, and Tales of the Travelling
    Swordsman, though looking back at my notes I see that Legion and Primrose Path
    weren't far behind in my ratings (the points I gave to these five games range
    between 8.5 and 9, so I obviously thought they were all pretty close). There
    were several others I quite enjoyed even though I didn't score them so highly.

    Of those five, Madam Spider's Web would seem to be the most eccentric choice in
    relation to the overall scoring in the comp; it seems to have suffered in some
    quarters from being too short. To me that wasn't a big issue; indeed with so
    many games to play it was rather nice to find one that didn't take the full two
    hours, and had I wanted to play longer I could always have gone back to try to
    find some of the other endings. There were several things I particular liked
    about it: the setting was well done, the puzzles were just the right level for
    me (I especially enjoyed the piano puzzle), and the author had obviously taken a
    great deal of care in implementing scenery objects and intelligent responses to
    player commands (for example, by sensibly filling in intermediate steps).

      SPAG: Any new projects in the works?

    EE: I'm about a month or two into a new TADS 3 game; it's a fairly substantial
    project, so it'll probably be quite a while before it seems the light of day. I
    have some fairly ambitious ideas on the role of the NPCs and the possibilities
    for plot-branching in this work, so the whole thing could come horribly unstuck!
    When it's done I hope it will appeal to people who liked Elysium Enigma,
    although it'll be a larger game than EE, and I've tried to take on board the
    criticism of some of EE's puzzles.

      SPAG: Thanks so much for agreeing to do this!

    EE: My pleasure!

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     Nolan Bonvouloir, author of "The Primrose Path"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      SPAG: You are a new face in the IF authorship community, always a nice thing
      to see.  Perhaps you can introduce yourself to SPAG's readers by
      telling us a little bit about your life and activities outside of IF.

    NB: I'm a college student going for a performance degree in music - I'm a
    pianist - with a large assortment of minors of similar practical value.  So far
    it hasn't caught up with me, though; this coming spring I'll be in Europe for
    the semester studying at a conservatory there. Lately I've been dedicating more
    time than I'd like to admit to composing, reading, and doodling on myself with
    felt-tip pens, and have occasionally been known to invent fattening desserts.

    I also have a closet obsession with metered poetry.  But don't tell any of my
    English professors.

      SPAG: You stated within Primrose Path that you are a complete non-programmer,
      and would never have been able to create it without Inform 7.  I suspect this
      sort of thing is music to Graham and Emily's ears, as perhaps their biggest
      goal in creating Inform 7 was to make IF authorship accessible to writers who
      are not coders.  Can you tell us a bit about your experience with Inform 7?
      How long did it take you to get up to speed with the system?

    NB: The opening of Primrose was kicking around in my head for quite a while; I
    started out trying to program it in Inform 6 about a year ago, but computers
    have never exactly bent to my will - at the time I'd never achieved anything
    more exotic than italics in HTML - and it was pretty much a lost cause from the
    start.  So I gave it up for a few months.  But when I visited the inform-
    fiction.org site last May in preparation for a second go at it, lo and behold,
    there was a shiny new site and a new version of Inform.  I downloaded I7, and by
    that night I'd reimplemented what had taken me three weeks to grind out in I6.

    I wouldn't say I really knew what I was doing until about a month or two after
    that, but once I got the hang of the language the speed of the process kind of
    took me by surprise.  I'm a horribly undisciplined writer, but somewhere along
    the line the game unlocked reserves of productivity I hadn't known I had; it's
    turned out to be far and away the longest thing I've ever written.

      SPAG: The aging spinster who is the protagonist of your game is about as far
      away from the typical IF hero as one can get.  Although there are of course
      magical elements, the whole feels more like a literary short story than genre
      fiction.  What led you to create such vivid and unusual characters and
      setting?

    NB: Well, thanks!  One of the things I love about IF is that players can choose
    the way they experience it-you can simply do the task you're set to do and get
    on with the game, or you can examine everything, exhaust all the conversational
    possibilities, follow up every red herring. . . . I wanted to at least try to
    reward both, so there ended up being rather a lot of easter eggy-type material
    in there.

    Much of the work I did in a binder that ended up being something like 200 pages
    long-starting with maps and flowcharts (when I was trying to keep track of all
    the ending combinations), and ending during beta-testing with lists of hundreds
    of crossed-out bugs.  But a big chunk of it is just playing around with the
    characters-for Leo and Irene I ended up spending a lot of time just making sure
    their histories were consistent-listing their background information, working
    out the plot, writing sample conversations.  It ended up being an awful lot of
    extra material, but in the end I think the game was better for it, especially
    since much of it wound up tucked away into some of the more obscure dialogues
    and cutscenes-it was all enormously fun to fit together.

      SPAG: Your game is told entirely in first person.  What was the logic behind
      this decision, and how difficult was it to make this conversion in Inform 7
      for you, a self-confessed novice to IF authorship?

    NB: I think the first transcript I ever wrote ended up being the first draft of
    the final confrontation between Irene and Matilda, so I guess there wasn't ever
    a conscious choice to use first person over second; it's been that way from the
    start.  And since the game was always headed toward the row between the player
    character and the player, I suppose I was trying throughout to keep them
    completely separate, and in that way first person definitely turned out to be
    less restrictive; I'm not sure I would have felt comfortable attributing strong
    emotions to a second-person PC, lest I invite the player to disagree.

    That said, it did take me quite a while to make the switch, though once I
    figured out which of the library files I wanted it wasn't too difficult to weed
    out all the yous.

      SPAG: There is a rather odd split between the player of your game and Matilda,
      the protagonist.  Matilda will, for instance, simply refuse to perform certain
      orders.  What was the philosophy behind this design?

    NB: When I started writing, I'd played very little IF beyond the old Infocom
    games, in which the protagonist is almost invariably a sort of bland,
    nondescript extension of the player.  I guess in a way I was trying to prove to
    myself that this didn't have to be the case.  So Matilda will take initiative if
    you don't give her a command, provide her own opinions, and if necessary defy
    the player outright-I was trying for a slightly unstable character consenting to
    be ordered around only because her goals happened to align with the player's.

    As an experiment in this, I'm not sure Primrose Path was especially successful,
    but I still find the idea interesting; the ability to make a split like this
    adds a dimension that as far as I know is totally unique to the IF medium. Even
    though it's been explored more thoroughly then I realized at the start of the
    writing process, I think there remains a lot that could be done with it.

      SPAG: What was the significance of the scene inside the painting in Irene's
      room?  It seemed to be a dead-end, and one I couldn't make head or tail out
      of.

    NB: And you're not the only one; I wince thinking about it.  It came about when
    it came time to explain where Leo's ankh-shaped key had come from, and I thought
    it might be interesting to hint, just as an aside, that there was a time loop
    thing going on and that Matilda herself had given it to Leo's grandfather.  But
    then I thought I'd be clever and hint that Matilda might, in fact, be Irene's
    mother-but yes, it was a dead end.

      SPAG: People have been asking, so I will too... Do all of those keys actually
      have a purpose?

    NB: Yes, indeed; they unlock the various doors in Leo's apartment.  If you go to
    the all-white room you can use them as a shortcut to get to any of the rooms in
    his house-that's how Leo would have used them, at any rate.

      SPAG: The best moment in your game for me was the raindrop puzzle.  I found
      it to be a moment of magic.  How did that come to you?

    NB: I knew there was going to be a time-stop puzzle at the climactic moment, and
    the rain was left over from a weather system I was trying to do that proved too
    complicated to implement.  That they happened to come together is sheer luck.

    Now that I think about it, there was one especially rainy weekend during the
    summer while my family was visiting some relatives on a lake, and while I did
    spend quite a bit of time writing outside then, I know that wasn't when I came
    up with it-I was too preoccupied by how existentially romantic it was to be
    writing in the rain.

      SPAG: Did you get a chance to play the other games from the Competition? If
      so, any thoughts or opinions?

    I did indeed.  Aunts and Butlers, Floatpoint, and Legion were all high points of
    the comp for me, but my favorite was probably Delightful Wallpaper, which I
    think had a really clever way of gradually revealing its premise.  There was a
    really great moment right after I'd begun the second half when I realized what
    the X ME description was hinting at - I immediately pictured the Gashlycrumb
    Tinies, and then I suddenly understood what "Edgar O. Weyrd" stood for.  I was
    slightly bedazzled by the time I finished.

      SPAG: It must be quite gratifying as a new author to finish second in the
      Competition your first time up. Were you surprised at your placing?

    NB: It was completely unexpected.  When I'd finished playing all the comp games
    I made a mental list of all the games I'd liked better than mine, and concluded
    that I would place seventh.  It was a little startling to find myself listed
    ahead of so many excellent entries, but more than that it's been all the
    feedback from the community that's been extraordinarily rewarding.

      SPAG: Will we get more IF from you?  Any projects in the works?

    NB:I hope so, and I do have a few different ideas I'm toying with, although
    working on new projects makes me feel a bit guilty at this point-I've still got
    several dozen things I get to fix for the next release of this one. (:

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     Emily Short, author of "Floatpoint"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      SPAG: At least at one point in the past I believe you were a graduate student
      studying classical culture.  Is this still the case today, or have you moved
      on to other things in your life outside IF?

    EM: I finished my PhD, but I haven't left classics.

      SPAG: Floatpoint struck me as a somewhat different direction for you.  I don't
      recall playing anything from you that was so unabashedly science fictional,
      without the fantasy elements that usually exist in your work.  Can you share
      with us a bit about the game's  inspiration?

    EM: Floatpoint started as a short scenario I wrote to test Inform 7 in the
    summer of 2004: the solarium area and the crowd behavior was written as a test
    of action groupings. So I had this idea of a society with extremely fussy
    etiquette, but I didn't want to write about a high fantasy court -- I felt I'd
    done enough of that kind of thing -- so I thought perhaps this might be a
    science fiction  society, instead.

    Most of the remaining details I didn't make up until I had decided on the
    central moral problem, when I decided to finish the game. I wanted to show a
    society that would be both appealing and upsetting to the player, and I wanted
    to give them important differences in the way they look at human life, personal
    rights, cultural continuity, and so on. It's easy to tolerate people who have
    odd customary quirks; it's much harder to tolerate groups that are (in your own
    ethical view) committing horrible crimes. So much of the history and
    development of the colony was determined by those constraints.

    I also wanted the planet itself to be a beautiful place. In a sense, this is
    irrelevant to the moral dilemma because there's nothing the player character can
    do that will keep it habitable in the long run; but I see it as one of the
    unavoidable tragedies of the scenario that the colonists are going to lose this
    place they love, and which the player character also finds very appealing. I
    thought that in a quiet way this shared sense of loss might make the colonists
    more sympathetic.

      SPAG: You mentioned within the game's credits that you actually  visited
      Hubbard Glacier in Alaska.  If only we were making big money on IF and could
      fund such research trips out of our venture capital!  But seriously, perhaps
      you can tell us a bit about that  experience, and how it informed your
      depiction of the glacier that  is encroaching on Aleheart in your game.

    EM: I hadn't started Floatpoint when I visited. I was staying with friends (both
    working for the park service at the time) who suggested going to see the
    glacier, and they told me a lot about it -- this is one of the few glaciers in
    the world that is growing rather than shrinking, and its movements have
    endangered towns and infrastructure. I found that idea fairly powerful and it
    later affected my ideas about what was happening to the colony. It also
    provided material for most of the outdoor scenery.

      SPAG: Floatpoint offers a wonderful sense of agency to the player.  It is a
      truly interactive fiction, as any reasonable decision the player makes about
      how to deal with the people of Aleheart is provided for.  In this sense
      Floatpoint reminded me of Slouching Towards Bedlam, a game I recall you having
      high praise for.  Has Slouching influenced your work since its appearance a
      few years ago?

    EM: Yes, I deliberately structured Floatpoint after Slouching Towards Bedlam: I
    wanted to present a moral decision at the end of the game, and have everything
    else lead up to that point, with replays giving the player new ideas about how
    to solve the main problem.

    At the same time, some of the decisions are reactions against Slouching. I
    wanted to make the moral choice more realistic and also more complex: with
    Slouching I felt it was pretty clear what the ideal outcome was, whereas I
    didn't want it to be so obvious with Floatpoint. I wanted the backstory to
    present itself more naturally and with fewer expository dumps. I didn't want
    there to be any very fiddly puzzles preventing the player from engaging with the
    story.

    When I describe the process this way it sounds dry and calculated, and it
    wasn't, really. I struggled with the game, and changed my mind about the central
    choice several times. At one point it was possible to get some cheerier (but, I
    now think, unrealistic and over-romanticized) results out of it. The player
    could fix things up to get Valenti and Aylene together, for one thing, and the
    "let's all live together happily" endings were more positive. The current
    endings are among the last things written: I had the game mostly done at the
    beginning of September, minus some testing and structural edits, but I didn't
    like the endings I'd written and I hadn't even made drafts of all of them. I was
    convinced that, for the structure of the game to succeed, each ending had to
    feel like a complete and solid conclusion to the story; I spent a couple of
    development days wrestling them out.

    I'm not sure it worked as I hoped. Slouching managed to get the player to think
    through the problem and figure out strategies, and it doesn't present a
    trivially-structured endgame choice. Floatpoint is too easily played as a piece
    of machinery, a mechanism to spit out conclusions in which the player has no
    investment, and that is exactly the opposite of what I wanted (though a
    perfectly logical result of the design). But I was constantly trying to make
    sure that the game played fast enough and the player never got really stuck;
    that may have caused me to oversimplify the structure. Or possibly it just
    needed to be a much larger game than a comp entry, or...

    Well, anyway. Things to bear in mind for next time.

      SPAG: Offering multiple endings that go beyond a simple plot branch in a
      game's climax has to increase the development complexity of a project
      immensely.  On top of that, Floatpoint is quite non-linear.  Have you
      developed any special techniques to keep it all straight?

    EM: Actually, I'd say the structure of Floatpoint is relatively simple: there's
    some freedom to explore, but there isn't a huge amount the player can do that
    will branch the plot in any important way, and the endgame is quite
    straightforward. I did use Inform 7's scene  mechanisms to track the plot events
    that can only happen once -- encounters with specific NPCs, mostly -- and that
    worked pretty well.  But this is not one of those games I needed a big plot
    chart to write.

      SPAG: How did you come to work with Echo Chernik, creator of  Floatpoint's
      cover art?

    EM: I had envisioned the colony as having a kind of art nouveau style of
    architecture, with strong botanical influences. So I did some web- searching for
    someone doing that style of work, and found Ms. Chernik. I really liked her
    portfolio, especially Drowned (http://echo-x.com/drowned.shtml), because it was
    beautiful but also a bit frightening and off-putting.  What was more, she had a
    model that I thought would be perfect for Aylene. So I decided to see whether
    she'd be interested in doing the project for a price I could remotely afford,
    and it turned out that she was. In my (admittedly limited) experience of
    professional illustrators, it's possible to negotiate about the price if you are
    flexible about the timeframe of the project and the rights, and that turned out
    to be the case here.

      SPAG: Most of your recent works have featured a novice mode intended  to help
      ease the new player into IF.  What kind of feedback have you gotten on this?
      Do you feel it is helping to attract new players?

    EM: I've had a few established IF players tell me they thought it was a neat
    idea to have this kind of mechanism built in, but I don't tend to hear from
    newbies. I also suspect that novice-friendly features in games are not going to
    attract new players unless I also make an effort to attract outside attention to
    these works. So far I haven't done much of that.

    So why bother with it at all? Mostly because it's easier to build these features
    in at the outset than it is to retrofit them later; if it's even remotely
    possible I'll eventually want to enter a piece of IF into an independent games
    contest or something like that, it seems like a good idea writing it with a
    novice audience partly in mind.

      SPAG: Your work, perhaps more than that of any other author, has  received
      exposure outside our little community.  Galatea, for instance, has become
      something of a staple in books on new media theory and practice.  Most
      recently, you had two of your works -- Galatea and Savoir Faire -- chosen for
      inclusion in the Electronic Literature Association's Collection Volume 1.  You
      also seem to be making an explicit effort to reach a wider audience through
      efforts like the just-mentioned novice mode.  Do you receive regular
      correspondence from those who aren't everyday IFers?

    EM: More like very occasional correspondence, I'd say.

      SPAG: Do you feel we can do more to attract them, and, if so, what?

    EM: Sure. It's partly a matter of making IF more accessible (interpreters
    easier to use, games easier to find in the archive, more attractive packaging,
    better built-in help and parsing) and partly a matter of actively drawing
    attention to it (entering it in competitions with a wider audience, finding
    other ways to market it).

    I think we are making progress on the accessibility front. I'm excited by the
    Treaty of Babel improvements, and the interpreters like Zoom and Spatterlight
    that will play many formats of games and keep track of a game library. It's
    easier than it used to be for authors in several systems to add typo-correction
    and help to their games, which may address some newbie frustrations. Incremental
    progress, but it adds up.

    It's a little less obvious where and how to promote IF. My impression is that
    the most successful approach is for people to introduce IF to groups they're
    already in touch with: Nick Montfort has done a lot to promote it in new media
    circles, several teachers have introduced it in their classrooms, Peter Nepstad
    has promoted his work to a specific niche of history buffs. There are also a few
    places where it's possible to submit IF and have it seen by a wider audience --
    notably, the Slamdance Guerilla Game-maker Competition (with "Whom  the Telling
    Changed" this year and "Book and Volume" for 2007). None of these are going to
    make IF hugely popular overnight, but they do get new people interested in the
    medium.

    I also see the use of cover art as part of this; a minor part, maybe, but my
    impression is that people who write blog entries or articles about IF like to
    have *something* they can use as a graphic. It's not as though IF tends to
    produce distinctive screenshots.

      SPAG: SPAG's readers all likely know that you have been working closely with
      Graham Nelson on Inform 7 since well before the public beta.  What would you
      say the current state of Inform 7 is?  Is it basically feature-complete at
      this point, and if so any idea when we might expect it to officially exit from
      beta status?

    EM: It's not feature-complete, no. There are several obvious things it still
    needs -- sound support for Glulx, better control over certain aspects of
    parsing, and so on -- and other things may or may not join that list. And then
    there are also simply a lot of bugs to be fixed.  I wouldn't want to guess at an
    official exit date.

      SPAG: Any thoughts you would like to share on the rest of the field from this
      year's Competition?  Particular favorites?  Interesting trends?

    EM: My favorite was "Elysium Enigma", for the deft way it handles the main non-
    player character. And I thought it was a pretty good set overall -- not too many
    entries that were a total waste of time, and a number of solid, enjoyable
    pieces. I'm not sure general competence is the kind of trend you can spend a lot
    of time analyzing, but it's a positive one all the same.

    But then, I think it's been a good year for IF in general: I've been impressed
    by the number of games (some quite ambitious) released after the competition
    ended. That's sometimes a bit of a dead period, so it's a good sign for the
    community that there's a significant amount of activity still going on.

    KEY TO SCORES AND REVIEWS--------------------------------------------------

    Consider the following review header:

    TITLE: Cutthroats
    AUTHOR: Infocom
    EMAIL: ???
    DATE: September 1984
    PARSER: Infocom Standard
    SUPPORTS: Z-code (Infocom/Inform) interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: LTOI 2
    URL: Not available.
    VERSION: Release 23

    When submitting reviews:  Try to fill in as much of this info as you can.
    Authors may not review their own games.

    INJUSTICE!: AN IF COMP 2006 REVIEW PACKAGE / RANT by Valentine Kopteltsev--

    [One of the truisms of each Competition is that no one ever ends up completely
    satisfied.  Everyone always has at least one pet game that they feel deserved to
    fare better than it did, and at least one more they feel was totally undeserving
    of its placing.  Indeed, my final ranking this year was quite different from the
    official scorecard.  Valentine below expresses some of the frustration we all
    feel each year after reading the results.  I hope authors and players will take
    it in the spirit it is intended -- i.e., I've been there! -- rather than as a
    slight on the perfectly worthy games that DID win. Continue reading this issue
    for a counterpoint review of Floatpoint by DJ Hastings, and if you disagree with
    Valentine's assessments of The Elysium Enigma and Tales of the Traveling
    Swordsman, well, why not submit a review of your own for next issue? --JM].

    From: Valentine Kopteltsev (uux SP@G mail.ru)

    NAME: The Elysium Enigma
    AUTHOR: Eric Eve
    EMAIL: eric.eve SP@G hmc.ox.ac.uk
    DATE: 2006
    PARSER: TADS 3
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/tads3/elysium/elysium.t3

    NAME: Floatpoint
    AUTHOR: Emily Short
    EMAIL: emshort SP@G mindspring.com
    DATE: 2006
    PARSER: Inform 7/Glulx
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/glulx/floatpoint/Floatpoint.zblorb

    NAME: Tales of the the Traveling Swordsman
    AUTHOR: Mike Snyder
    EMAIL: tales_ts SP@G hotmail.com
    DATE: 2006
    PARSER: Hugo
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/hugo/tales_ts/tales_ts.hex

    Since my first participation in IF-Comp 2000, I don't think I've ever been as
    disappointed by the competition outcome as this year. It wasn't just the fact
    that my favourite game, The Traveling Swordsman, didn't reach the podium; I can
    understand why The Primrose Path ended up higher than it, although this one
    definitely wasn't my bottle of vodka, and I'd be perfectly content if it were,
    say, Delightful Wallpaper, Legion, or Mobius that had beaten TTS. But the way it
    turned out it just doesn't seem right to me. I really don't get it. (No, that
    doesn't express my frustration adequately). HECK, PEOPLE, I REALLY DON'T GET
    IT!!!

    (Calm down, Valentine, calm down...)

    To make my point clear, I'll try to compare the individual aspects of three
    games -- Floatpoint, The Elysium Enigma and, well, The Traveling Swordsman. Such
    an approach suggests itself especially in this case, because, with all their
    superficial diversity, all these works are based on essentially the same basic
    principles (in particular, they're all plot-oriented IF), and thus can be
    evaluated by similar canons. I'll try to be as objective as possible, although
    I'm aware it'd be a hard job to master, considering how biased I am.

    Since, as I said, all three works are plot-oriented IF, let's discuss the
    stories underlying them first.

    The Elysium Enigma features a spy mystery of sorts. Over the years, I've drawn
    up my own rule of thumb for checking whether a text adventure succeeds as a
    mystery: namely, trying to figure out whether its story would have worked as
    static fiction. Bad news for Elysium: it wouldn't. My main complaint is, I'm
    confronting dummies here. To avoid spoilers, I'll just say -- any spy with a
    hint of professional flair and/or experience would know it's time to split
    before I got halfway through the game.

    The partial redemption could be a better development of a collateral plot branch
    -- namely, finding out why the Elysium people are so wary towards civilization
    in general, and the Empire the PC represents in particular. Unfortunately, it
    doesn't get much support from the direction of the game author, remaining little
    more than a dialog option in a conversation with a NPC.

    Floatpoint offers a multiple choices kind of story. You are a newly assigned
    Earth ambassador on a distant colony. The so-called Gift Day, a central event of
    the colonists' culture, lies close ahead, and you have to represent the
    metropolis worthily. The main things that matter are, what you wear on this
    occasion, and what you give as a present to the colony's envoy.

    The idea clearly has potential, and might have worked just great -- if it wasn't
    for the way the whole thing is arranged.

    Currently, it looks like this: somewhere in the middle of the game, the player
    stumbles upon an info dump telling her/him something like, "if you wear this and
    that, and offer that and this as a present, it'll please the colonists beyond
    all measure, but also will ruin your career" (well, it's probably not as blatant
    as that, but still pretty obvious for anyone who can put one and one together.)
    After you find appropriate clothing and a gift to achieve the effect you want,
    you're asked again, "Are you sure you want to do that? Your choice would most
    certainly result in your career being ruined, although the colonists would be
    pleased beyond all measure." After your confirmation, the game ends very soon
    with the message, "Wow, your choice impressed the colonists beyond all measure!
    Sadly, your career is ruined now." (Again, I'm exaggerating a bit, but the basic
    idea is reproduced pretty authentically.)

    Another thing about this choices business that made me distrustful: I'm told
    what a sophisticated symbolism is associated with the Gift Day, how meaningful
    the tiniest detail might be; for that, the range of clothing/gift combinations
    meaningful to the colonists is ridiculously limited. One could point out
    implementing all possible combinations would be a pain; I'd reply, that's a
    problem of the game author, not me. Yet, I admit -- I'm probably getting unfair
    here, and my aforementioned bias starts to show through.

    After all the plot-related contrivances of the previous two works, the story of
    The Traveling Swordsman may appear a pretty straightforward, predictable and
    even somewhat mundane fantasy stuff. It goes on this way until the final
    episode, which -- no, it doesn't turn everything upside down; rather, it shifts
    the emphases somewhat, changing the story's perspective, and allowing TTS to win
    the PLOT nomination cleanly.

    (A short diversion is needed here: it's true that the past IF-Comp will go down
    in history, among other things, as a competition of plot twists of varying
    quality. However, this fact doesn't mean that plot twists are a bad thing in
    themselves. In particular, the one of TTS is just great, because it's (a) fresh
    (original, non-overused -- pick the term that suits you best), and (b)
    sufficiently linked to the main action to avoid the feeling it's been forced
    onto the story whether it belongs there or not.)

    ATMOSPHERE and WRITING are categories all three games succeed very well in. It's
    hard to give preference to any of the works; maybe Floatpoint has a slight
    advantage here -- thanks to its writing's more obvious brilliance.

    GAMEPLAY is another aspect where each of the works reviewed goes its own way. In
    Elysium Enigma, for instance, you have to "run after the puzzles", because
    exploring on your own risk is the premise of the story. There's nothing wrong
    with this, and the fact the game fails as a mystery doesn't automatically mean
    it fails as a text adventure. One observation, though: I don't think it's
    possible to reach the most optimal ending within the two hours limit, except by
    playing directly from the hints/walkthrough.

    In Floatpoint, you aren't left without guidance, at least at the early stages.
    You even have a reminder function that tells you about the tasks pending.
    However, after the basic goal (preparing for Gift Day) becomes clear, you are
    more or less on your own. The problem is, the whole thing also gets somewhat out
    of balance at that point -- the paths for different clothing/gift combinations
    are of VERY varying difficulty; one is almost trivial, while the other requires
    considerable mental efforts on the player's part. And (you could have guessed it
    already), to check out all the major endings within the two hours limit, you'd
    have to play from the walkthrough.

    The Traveling Swordsman offers the most linear playing process of all. At every
    stage of the game, the player has a clear "tactical subgoal" to work on. What
    amazed me was the almost perfect timing: it seems the author has undertaken a
    thorough time-study to make sure his game was winnable within exactly two hours
    -- no more, no less. While I'm not inclined to penalize games for being too
    large for the IF-Comp, I couldn't leave such a careful pre-planning without
    countenance either... which automatically means winning another nomination for
    TTS.

    The CHARACTERS. Again, it's hard to decide about the winner here. Floatpoint and
    Traveling Swordsman employ the same approach that makes the authors' work
    easier: both games just restrict communication with NPCs, using more or less
    plausible excuses.

    Compared to this, Elysium seems to be the most "upright" game in this respect --
    all its characters are animated richly, with a wide range of responses. However,
    what all this sophistication is good for if the behavior principles of the most
    important NPC are fundamentally wrong, based not on common sense and reality
    ("try to reach my goals yet slip away as soon as my opponent has enough reasons
    for suspecting me"), but on adventure game logic ("let him win -- at any
    price")! Again, it may be pointed out to me more realistic behavior patterns
    would be a pain to implement; and once more, I'd reply -- that's a problem of
    the game author, not me. Only this time, I wouldn't have the feeling of being
    unfair.

    PUZZLES clearly weren't the main priority for any of the games reviewed. Please
    don't misunderstand me -- all three offer enough entertainment on this point,
    featuring a variety of solid and fun to solve puzzles; yet, none of them can be
    even remotely compared to, say, Delightful Wallpaper, or Moebius. Well, plot-
    oriented IF is plot-oriented IF; there must be a reason for it being called this
    way;).

    MISCELLANEOUS. All three works equally prepossess the player by impeccably
    thorough implementation -- any player input that seems even remotely reasonable
    in a given situation produces an appropriate response.

    This also is the only category Elysium Enigma and Floatpoint offer something TTS
    doesn't: namely, gadgets fun to fiddle with.

    However, Floatpoint receives a portion of frowns here, as well -- for a couple
    of bugs, one having to do with the scene change machinery getting stuck, and one
    with an NPC cut-scene breaking out like a bolt from the blue in a situation it
    clearly hasn't been intended to.

    The conclusions. The only point Elysium Enigma and Floatpoint have an
    unquestionable advantage over their less successful competitor is the one
    considering gadgets fun to play, which seems a bit meager.

    Well, again, please don't get me wrong: I'm not saying EE or FP are bad -- on
    the contrary, they're both excellent games. Neither do I contend TTS is the best
    IF-work ever written -- in fact, in some respects it is inferior, say, to
    Distress, Mike Snyder's entry in the previous year's Comp. However, of the three
    games, The Traveling Swordsman does the best job in mastering the most crucial
    aspects of the IF trade (and demonstrating a good school) than the others. Sure,
    the drik in Elysium Enigma and the communication terminal in Floatpoint were
    great toys, but the idea of them being primary factors for game ranking,
    outweighing even things like a more convincing plot, and a better balanced
    gameplay, just doesn't seem right to me.

    And one final gripe: in many fields of industry, we currently have a situation
    where secondary "whistles and bells", as well as good promotion are more
    important for the market success of a product than the quality of the functions
    this product originally has been designed for. I honestly hope IF won't follow
    this trend.

    REVIEWS -------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: David Jones (drj SP@G pobox.com)

    TITLE: The Apocalypse Clock
    AUTHOR: GlorbWare
    E-MAIL: Jfs928 SP@G aol.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 6 standard
    SUPPORTS: Z-code
    AVAILABLITY: freeware; IF-Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/zcode/apocalypse/apocalypse.z5
    VERSION: Release 1 / Serial number 060801 / Inform v6.31 Library 6/11 S

    The blurb that came with the competition release of this game goes "You must
    stop the end of the world. Your tools in this task: A crayon and a cat."  You
    can tell that we're not dealing with a serious work.  It starts with 3 boxed
    quotes.  A little over the top, but given the humor in the rest of the game,
    it's probably intentional.

    The PC is a lazy wastrel, labeled by others as being paranoid for building an
    Apocalypse Clock.  One day the clock goes off, indicating impending apocalypse
    and thus the adventure begins.  As the narrator puts it: "It looks like you'll
    have to pull a Duke Nukem and stop the end of the world."

    "Your Bedroom".  I rarely find this a good location from which to start a text
    adventure.  There are spelling mistakes in the opening text which are probably
    not deliberate.  There are a few more punctuation mistakes, includes the classic
    its/it's confusion, but I found it easy to avert my gaze around them.  For some
    reason the entire game is in a fixed pitch font.  I had to read other people's
    reviews to spot this; it looks just fine in my Spatterlight set up (Monaco 11)
    and I'm used to staring at fixed pitch fonts all day.

    Once the surface issues had worn off I found the writing funny, self-
    referential,  and irreverent.  X ME gives the knowing response: 'You're just
    your normal self, "as good-looking as ever", as they say.'  Its sarcasm could
    perhaps put a lot of people off, but I found it genuinely amusing.  It's pretty
    much the only reason I'm reviewing the game.  Without its witty writing we would
    have nothing but a carcass of game, for the mechanics of the game are very poor.
     Only the very bare minimum of objects are implemented: scenery implied or
    mentioned in room descriptions will rarely be present.

    A typical example (from the opening):

    Your Bedroom (on your bed)
    You survey your small bedroom. To be frank, it's messy. Your clothes hang in
    strange places. The carpet is stained with unidentifiable substances. The
    wallpaper is faded and tacky, the bed is falling apart, and the drywall is
    crumbly and, inexplicably, rusty, but it's home.

    >> x bed

    You look at your awful bed. It's falling apart and kinda smelly, and seems to be
    upholstered with a towel.

    The Apocalypse Clock reads 00:00:00:59.

    >> smell bed

    You smell nothing unexpected.

    The Apocalypse Clock reads 00:00:00:58.

    >> x drywall

    You can't see any such thing.

    As well as the bed's smell and the drywall not being implemented, you can see
    from that transcript that the Apocalypse Clock counts down.  Yes, a timed
    puzzle; you have about 60 turns to play the entire game.  That immediately tells
    you that The Apocalypse Clock is not a long game, and it isn't.  It's also quite
    a big hint that you'd better not hang around doing things like scraping the
    inexplicable rust off the non-existent drywall just in case you need a source of
    iron oxide later.  You don't.  Timed puzzles aren't popular, but in this case it
    seems pretty fair.  It's the game's key device to add tension, you know about it
    right from the beginning, and it's an overarching time constraint, not one that
    is used to make a particularly annoying timed puzzle.

    Note that this is not a one-room game; this might not be obvious from the
    description of the first room.  The exit out of Your Bedroom isn't described;
    that's a bug, and is frankly typical of the attention paid to describing and
    implementing the geography.  You simply have to use trial and error to guess
    your way out of the first location.   You probably ought to look around for some
    completely unclued and crucial objects as well, because you won't be able to
    return to get them due to what is probably an accidental one-way link between
    the living room and a secret location that you discover.   Later on you'll
    probably discover that the front door is mentioned but doesn't exist; ENTER
    PICTURE inexplicably garners the response "You bump into your front door."
    Personally, I didn't find any of these defects a real problem in my playthrough
    for the competition though I can see that it would cause others to more or less
    immediately throw the game in the bin.  Persevere and you'll discover how to use
    an aging computer to activate a door that is simply totally undescribed, no
    description of the door appears whatsoever.

    The game hasn't been beta-tested and it shows.  Deviate from the author's
    clearly intended (narrow) path and you'll discover bugs, unimplemented things,
    and more bugs.  Almost any puzzle in the game can be solved "in the wrong
    order", usually with disastrous results.  A typical example involves Sara (your
    cat, more on her later) who starts the game in your inventory.  Now, you're
    clearly not supposed to be able to relinquish Sara, but you can, and if you do,
    then she still speaks to you later on.

    Sara is the game's principal NPC.  She's your cat; you're compelled to carry her
    round to save her from the apocalypse.  She talks, with a very bad cockney
    accent.  She's the highlight of the show.  The opposition between the player and
    Sara provides much of the humor.  Much of the time Sara, like most cats, is
    content to sleep, but she'll occasionally inject some sarcasm such as "Oh, I see
    you've discovered the secre' tunnel I built some years ago."  It's a bit of a
    toss up to decide whether Sara or the narrator is the most sarcastic.  The rest
    of the humor is a mixture of the slightly surreal (the "inexplicably rusty
    drywall"; later in a different location: "its walls gleam with some sort of
    creepy moisture, with frayed wiring hanging from the ceiling like spooky, nasty-
    smelling vines."), fourth wall breakers (examples of which would probably
    spoil), and what I suppose a literary critic would call the narrator's interior
    monologue (just after a PC is becomes inoperable: "Goodbye, noble computer. Your
    memory will keep going, and going, and going.").

    I feel that if you can somehow see past the unpolished writing, the under-
    implemented features, the badly implemented features, the almost tediously
    simple and cliched puzzles - if you can somehow see past all that then there's
    the kernel of amusing, witty, creative, small, game here.  Humor is always
    tricky, but I find the author's style pretty funny.  The writing is raw, and it
    could definitely do with a steadying influence from time to time.  Beta-testing,
    really any sort of testing, would definitely be an improvement.  Almost anywhere
    that code comes into play (puzzles; rules for not being to drop Sara; doors with
    special opening requirements) the player can poke around and cause things to
    fall over.  You'll probably do it accidentally.  It doesn't indicate lack of
    testing so much as a complete inability to imagine that player might do anything
    other than type in the walkthrough.  The crayon mentioned in the blurb never
    appears; a pencil is used instead.

    It placed 31st (out of 43).  I scored it 7.

    I would be very intrigued to see the author produce a work with more craft
    applied to it, I feel there's a raw wit and imagination that could be
    successfully harnessed.  Please let's have Sara the cat in the next game too.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Valentine Kopteltsev (uux SP@G mail.ru)

    TITLE: Aunts and Butlers
    AUTHOR: Robin Johnson
    E-MAIL: rj SP@G robinjohnson.f9.co.uk
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Non-standard
    SUPPORTS: Web-Browsers
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/web/auntsandbutlers.html
    VERSION: -

    (The reader should be informed beforehand that all my oh-so-clever insinuations
    following came to me as an afterthought. While actually playing A&B, I was just
    enjoying the ride for the most part, never being distracted by secondary
    ponderings.)

    The game has (and the author's blurb for it seems to endorse it) an unmistakable
    P. G. Woodhouse-feel (reminding of the Jeeves and Wooster series in particular),
    but as I thought about it more closely, I realized it wasn't *that* Woodhouse-
    like at all.

    Why do I think so? Well, remember the original novels: Wooster appears before us
    not just as a mere blunderer (although this part of his nature usually plays a
    major role in the story) but also as the nobility in the flesh, a person who
    very rarely, if at all, pursues one's own ends, and who's ready to risk his own
    reputation to help out his friend (well, actually, the choice is made for him in
    most cases, but that's another thing).

    In Aunts and Butlers, however, we find an entirely different kind of person as a
    protagonist: a very purposeful man who not only knows what he wants, but is also
    capable of acting pretty mean at times to reach his goals. If anything, A&B
    represents a post-Woodhouse setting, where most of Wooster's fortune has
    trickled away through his fingers (which seems pretty realistic, since he's
    never been a man too concerned about his revenues, to put it mildly), carrying
    away most of his aristocratic scruples and complications, and replacing them
    with healthy cynicism in the process. This personality change did him good in
    the long run -- by the end of the story, our hero not only gains his wealth
    back, but also acquires something the original Wooster never could even dream
    of; I mean the esteem of his valet, who stops treating his master as a mix of a
    child to be nursed and a marionette to be manipulated, and begins to see him as
    an equal partner (granted, the last one is my assumption, but it's more or less
    implied by the game).

    If I were the game author, I'd provide A&B with the subtitle "Revenge of Bertie
    Wooster", because the protagonist really pays back the people who's been
    torturing him in the original Woodhouse novels. The only thing I missed in this
    respect in the game was a nasty prank on Bingo Little (you know, something like
    sending him down a smelly trash chute to the feet of his oblivious wife and
    uncle.)

    If you aren't as much a fan of P. G. Woodhouse as I am, you'll probably see
    Aunts and Butlers just as a light-hearted, not too deep work with an
    unproblematic gameplay, good enough to while away an hour or so. It has a slight
    general adventuring  frosting, which isn't necessarily needed and could be
    removed without anybody missing it, yet, on the other hand, it doesn't hamper
    the game, either. Isn't this worth a rating of at least 6 points? Sure it is.

    There's one more thing, though: A&B hasn't been created with one of the major
    IF-development systems -- instead, the author employed JavaScript. In itself,
    this isn't such a rare thing; it's the surprisingly good parser that makes it
    practically unique. You couldn't find any complaints about it in my review,
    could you? That's because it's really on a par with the needs and expectations
    of the modern text adventurer, or at least very close to that. I imagine what an
    awfully huge lot of work it must have taken to bring it to that quality level
    from scratch! Well, doesn't this extra amount of work deserve an increase of the
    game rating by at least one point? Sure it does -- at least as far as I'm
    concerned;).

    Competition score: 7

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: DJ Hastings (dj.hastings SP@G wavecable.com)

    TITLE: Beam
    AUTHOR: Madrone Eddy
    EMAIL: pe8283 SP@G yahoo.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Quest Standard
    SUPPORTS: Quest interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/quest/beam/Beam_1_10.cas
    VERSION: 1.10

    Beam is the first game I've played using the Quest interpreter. Quest's
    interface is similar to the Adrift Runner, with the addition of a panel on the
    side of the screen. The panel contains lists of objects in the room and in
    inventory, with buttons for some common actions like "get" and "examine".
    There's also a panel of buttons corresponding to the standard directions.

    I don't know whether it's the fault of the author or the interpreter, but Beam
    doesn't seem to be integrated very well with this side panel. For example, some
    objects are mentioned in the room description but not in the object list. But
    you can't just ignore the list, because there are other objects that appear in
    the list and not in the room description. And a few objects show up both places!
    As a player I'd probably never use the button interface, but having a list of
    objects that I can interact with could be handy- if I could trust it. But I
    can't, and so I have to examine everything in the room description *and* keep an
    eye on the object list. Instead of saving me time, the object list is wasting
    more of it.

    Another Quest feature used by Beam is the ability to have some things occur in
    real time. Beam includes separate hunger, thirst, and oxygen timers, all of
    which count down in real time, as well as a couple of doors that close
    automatically a few seconds after you've opened them. These doors were an
    irritation more than anything. Several times when I was going slowly I'd open a
    door only to have it close again before I had gone through it. At other times, I
    had to wait for a door to close after I'd gone through because I could find no
    way to close the door on my own. (The doors were part of an airlock, and I
    couldn't open both at once.) This would have worked much better for me if the
    doors had closed automatically when I went through, or something like that,
    instead of operating on timers.

    Beam contains a lot of empty space. In fact, there are three or four empty rooms
    for each interesting one! These are mostly hallways- catwalks, actually-
    connecting the other rooms. Now, I don't mind walking through a hallway on the
    way from one interesting room to another- but seven of them? That's overdoing it
    a bit.

    And even most of the interesting rooms (and by "interesting" I mean "contains
    something") are unnecessary to the game. In fact, beating the game only required
    me to enter three such rooms, along with twelve catwalks. The other rooms
    contain puzzles that can help satisfy the hunger and thirst timers. But since
    these timers are in real time, you can easily finish the game well before you
    starve. Since I was using the walkthrough for most of the game, I had no
    motivation to go solve the other puzzles.

    Why was I using the walkthrough? Well, I started the game by a tree, and
    thoroughly explored it. I could climb the tree (to several different levels) and
    do several things, but I couldn't figure out where to go from there. I couldn't
    go anywhere from the ground but up the tree, and I couldn't go anywhere from the
    top of the tree but back down. So eventually, I checked the walkthrough. It
    turned out that I needed to climb the tree and then go in. Not into a hole in
    the tree or something like that, but into the tree's top branches! This is not
    at all an intuitive thing to try, particularly since there's nothing in the text
    even hinting at the proper action, but that's not the worst of it. Remember the
    button panel with the various directions? Well, a button is only enabled if you
    can go in that direction, so the panel acts as a quick exits list. But from the
    top of the tree, the "in" button is *disabled*. In other words, the game
    interface told me that I couldn't go in when I really could! This destroyed my
    faith that the game was going to play fair with me, so I used the walkthrough
    heavily from that point on.

    Those were the worst problems that I ran into, but there were also some bugs, a
    bunch of unimplemented stuff, and some disambiguation problems. (At one point I
    typed "pull lever", and the game responded "You don't see a doorknob.")

    As far as I remember, the writing was free of errors. (I couldn't save a
    transcript in Quest, so I can't be sure that there weren't *any* mistakes, but
    I'd remember it if there were many.) And most of the game was clear about where
    I could go and what I could interact with. I did have one problem with the room
    descriptions, though: I was never told where my current location was in the "big
    picture." For example, most of the game takes place on a network of catwalks.
    But I didn't know whether these were suspended in midair in a big warehouse,
    running through narrow underground tunnels, or balanced on a table in a giant's
    laboratory. (This last one was my original guess, but eventually I found out
    that I was wrong.) The lack of context made the game feel extremely artificial
    and... well, bland.

    And that's a pity, because the setting could have been made very interesting. In
    fact, I personally thought that the game's setup was its strongest point. It's
    an interesting idea that I liked, and could have made for a good game.
    Unfortunately, the author didn't go anywhere with it, and I didn't even get to
    find out about it until the game was over.

    I also liked some of the other ideas in the game, particularly the initial
    puzzle of figuring out where you are. I had problems with it (like the tree
    mentioned above), so it didn't actually work for me, but I still think the idea
    is a good one.

    Unfortunately, the game's good ideas were overwhelmed by its poor
    implementation, and I have to advise skipping it.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: DJ Hastings (dj.hastings SP@G wavecable.com)

    TITLE: Delightful Wallpaper
    AUTHOR: Andrew Plotkin
    EMAIL: erkyrath SP@G eblong.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 7
    SUPPORTS: Z-code interpreters with blorb support
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-archive/games/zcode/Wallpaper.zblorb
    VERSION: Release 4

    Delightful Wallpaper divides neatly into two main puzzles. Since these are very
    different from each other and almost unrelated, I'm going to discuss them
    separately.

    THE LOGIC MAZE

    The first puzzle is a kind of maze, although more like Robert Abbott's "logic
    mazes" than the twisty little variety that everyone seems to hate. You start
    exploring a small mansion, but you lack the ability to do anything but walk
    around. As you move around, though, the mansion reacts in predictable ways. For
    example, walking through one doorway may open a door elsewhere, entering a room
    might change the direction of a one way door- that sort of thing.

    To put it briefly, I loved this puzzle. The mansion opens up a little bit at a
    time as you play. Manipulating the mansion properly will allow you to reach a
    new area, which you can use to manipulate another bit of the mansion, which will
    allow you to reach another new area... and it keeps going on like that until
    you've explored the entire place. You always have either a new room to visit or
    a new thing to play with. This pacing kept me interested and engaged through the
    entire puzzle.

    There are a few places where I might have become bored trying to figure out
    exactly what had happened after I'd triggered some change in the mansion. But
    this problem was avoided by my notebook, where "I" kept notes of all the things
    that affected the mansion and, once I happened upon them, what the effects were.
    And even if *I* didn't notice a change, the *PC* would notice and jot it down,
    so when I checked the notebook I'd see what was going on. This kept me from ever
    getting stuck for long, and so I never did get bored or frustrated with the game
    during this puzzle.

    In case I haven't made myself clear: this was my favorite puzzle of the entire
    competition.

    THE "INTENTIONS" PUZZLE

    Partway through the maze part of the game, I made the note: "If this keeps up,
    I'll love the game."

    Sadly, "this" didn't keep up.

    The second puzzle is a good idea, but it just didn't work like the first one
    did. For this part of the game, the mansion has been populated with characters
    for a murder mystery. As you move about, you see notes like "Mr. P__ will pass
    through the room, carrying a tray of drinks." You will also collect "intentions"
    and use them in various places, modifying what the characters will do. The idea
    is that adding intentions in various ways will change the things that will go on
    in the other rooms, allowing you to further manipulate the characters.

    I like the idea. It could be really interesting trying to arrange intentions in
    the proper order to make things come out "right," like the puzzle in "Lock and
    Key". There are two problems, though. First, there is a single right use for
    each intent, and you can tell from your notes whether you've got it right or
    not. Thus, there's no need to think carefully about how the intents will affect
    each other, because you can deal with them one at a time.

    The second problem is that it's not at all clear how exactly the intents will
    work until you get it right. So my procedure for solving the puzzle was to find
    an intent, make a guess as to where it might be used, go there and try using it
    randomly until something fit, and repeat. This did not make for a satisfying
    puzzle.

    [EDIT: It turns out that I was mistaken about there being a single right use for
    each intent. The author informs me that there are multiple uses for many of the
    intents that can lead to a winning solution. I just didn't run into them, or
    else didn't realize that they weren't dead ends. So if you take the time to
    experiment instead of playing from the notes, this is probably a much more
    interesting puzzle. -DJ]

    MISCELANEOUS AND CONCLUSION

    A few other miscellaneous things: There are quite a few unimplemented things
    that should be, such as the walls. Given the game's title, I really should be
    able to look at them. The setup and story never really get explained; I still
    don't know what's going on. And the second part of the game contained some
    innuendo, which detracted from the game for me and could have been done without,
    and a lot of murders, which I didn't mind but you may want to be aware of,
    particularly if kids might be playing the game. (I treated the innuendo like I
    do bad language, and docked a point from my comp rating for the game.) Finally,
    it would have made things easier for me if I could have just typed "notes" to
    look at my notepad.

    My recommendation: Get this game, and just play the first half. (That's until
    you use the first intention.) That half of the game is well designed and well
    worth your time.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Felix Plesoianu (felixp7 SP@G yahoo.com)

    TITLE: Ekphrasis
    AUTHOR: JB Ferrant
    EMAIL: lejibe SP@G gmail.com
    DATE: November 27, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 6 French edition
    SUPPORTS: Glulx interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: freeware; author's website
    URL: http://ginko968.free.fr/jeux/ekphrasis.htm
    VERSION: First release

    Once in a while I get my hands on a game that is unusual in so many ways I don't
    even know where to start. You know, the kind that doesn't seem to hold much
    promise at first, but then you notice this nice feature, and that one, and you
    want to play just a little further before going to bed... you're charmed.

    To get one thing out of the way, Ekphrasis is written in French. If you speak
    the language but haven't played a French text adventure before, don't worry.
    Most commands are what you'd expect, shortcuts included (such as 'x' for
    'examiner'). You can even go west by typing 'w', something I did without even
    thinking about it. Be sure to type 'aide' at the beginning; it  will point out a
    less obvious command that happens to be used a lot during the game.

    The story is reminiscent of an old stylish detective movie. A particular
    Renaissance painting appears to have been stolen and replaced with a copy.
    You've been called to evaluate it, but things are a lot more complicated than
    they first seem. Being a cranky old professor with a distaste for modern
    technology doesn't help either. If you're expecting humor, you won't be
    disappointed. I haven't had such a laugh since Dutch Dapper IV.

    The gameplay is neatly divided between interactive scenes and "talk to"-
    triggered dialogues. The former are short and focused, usually one or two
    locations with a handful of items and NPCs and a clear goal; the latter are
    long-ish but charming, and do a great job of portraying the characters.
    Otherwise there isn't much in the way of literary style. Ekphrasis relies on
    pictures - otherwise beautiful - to describe the locations. Too bad it also
    relies on pictures for essential information such as phone numbers, which really
    should stay in the text. Be sure to keep the walkthrough at hand.

    One thing the game is particularly good at is feeling natural. Most locations
    are famous spots in Europe; the NPCs and situations are what you'd expect to
    find there. Even the maze towards the end (yes, there's a maze!) is perfectly
    justified, and not all that complicated. The NPCs, though unhelpful, are at
    least pro-active, often starting conversations on their own. Puzzles are
    generally logical, but they sometimes require perfect timing and/or performing a
    precise sequence of steps which may not be so obvious. Add to that my abysmal
    puzzle-solving skills and the sheer length of the game and you'll see why I
    ended up following the walkthrough a lot. Except, of course, when following it a
    la lettre led to an untimely death. Oh well, it's a big game. Things can easily
    go out of sync.

    Speaking of size, Ekphrasis is too large for its own good. I spent more than ten
    hours on the game, or so I think, because I lost count with all the loading and
    saving. Apparently, so did the author. Most of the scenery is not implemented,
    not even as a "you don't need that" message. A lot of synonyms are missing in
    action as well, which can become quite a problem when the game fails to
    recognize a noun from its own room descriptions. There's also a good deal of
    "read the author's mind" towards the end. I suppose it's difficult to explain
    everything when you write such a big game all by yourself. And despite the
    author's assurances that specialist knowledge is not required to win, there were
    a couple of spots when even Wikipedia couldn't help me.

    All in all, the game kept me interested to the end despite all the annoyances.
    Fun, education, suspense and even romance - Ekphrasis has them all, so allow me
    to conclude as a Frenchman would: chapeau!

    P.S. I was unable to hear the sound for technical reasons, so I can't make any
    comments about it; my apologies to everyone interested.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Mike Harris (M.Harris SP@G spi-bpo.com)

    TITLE:  An Escape to Remember
    AUTHOR: The 2nd IF Whispers Team
    EMAIL: dbs SP@G cs.wisc.edu
    DATE: July, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 7
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF-Archive
    URL: http://www.drizzle.com/~dans/if/ifw2/
    VERSION: 1

    An Escape to Remember is a "Chinese Whispers / Telephone" style interactive
    piece, written by 14 different authors each of whom only saw the preceding
    section of the game.  Needless to say, this makes for a very schizophrenic story
    line.  That said, and perhaps in spite of itself, it's quite fun to play.

    The story starts out with a timed puzzle with a sort of secret agent / escape
    from a locked room premise and ultimately morphs into a surreal, almost Roger
    Zelazny finish.  In turns it's easy, difficult, serious, silly, well written,
    juvenile, buggy and error free.

    Unless I'm mistaken at least some of the authors fudged the premise.  There's a
    segment about mid-game that incorporates a return to a much earlier module, many
    sections are seamless enough that the transitions between what in retrospect are
    probably multiple authors is not obvious, and some puzzles incorporated a
    similar style of solution that charitably might be dismissed as inherent to the
    insular nature of IF but which in reality likely came from some "against the
    rules" cribbing.  To be fair, I suppose that this could also be attributed to
    some clean-up after the fact to improve playability.

    I did run into some trouble in the earliest part of the game, before I
    understood that objects collected in a previous module could be employed in the
    subsequent one.  Of course, I then had the PC toting a huge number of red
    herrings from module to module, not wanting to drop the ones I (correctly)
    suspected as useless out of apprehension that I would not be able to backtrack
    and collect them had they been needed.

    The best puzzles required some thought, several objects and multiple steps taken
    in the correct order to solve.  Others were almost irritatingly easy, leaving
    only the most obvious course of action as a solution.  The modules involving
    them might have been more compelling and memorable had a little bit more
    "challenge" been built in.

    Players should be aware that there is one particular puzzle in about the first
    third of the game that, as far as I could tell, can only be solved by trial and
    error, with the results of an unsuccessful trial putting the game in an
    unwinnable state.  To my way of thinking, the "Undo" or "Restore" commands have
    no place in the routine solving of an IF puzzle and I was more than a little bit
    disappointed in the author of this section for forcing this.

    There are some bugs.  Some modules have minor, annoying but ultimately
    irrelevant syntax bugs.  For example, the PC might run across a "Mauve Paisley
    Grip":

    > Open Mauve

    You can't see any such thing.

    > Open Paisley

    You can't see any such thing.

    > Open Grip

    You can't see any such thing.

    > Open Mauve Paisley Grip

    Opened.

    Or

    >Read paper

    Nothing is written on the paper.

    >X paper

    Written on the paper is the Gettysburg Address.

    The buggiest are two modules involving a subterranean railroad - I found it
    possible to pick up a location as though it were an object, large objects that
    require the PC to drop everything else in inventory can be placed inside
    containers and lifted without such restriction, and I was able to search the
    contents of a container held by an NPC before obtaining possession of the
    container itself.  None of these bugs made the game unplayable but they're the
    sort of thing that should have been caught and fixed before release.  I might
    also add that the buggy sections were redeemed at least in part by some of the
    best, most entertaining and richest writing of the game.

    Despite the inherent continuity problems in such a format I enjoyed playing An
    Escape to Remember.  Although there were flaws there were also some good puzzles
    and entertaining mini-plots which definitely made play worthwhile in spite of
    the more uneven bits.  On a scale of 1 to 10 I give it a 5.5 to 6 for difficulty
    and a 6.5 to 7 overall.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: DJ Hastings (dj.hastings SP@G wavecable.com)

    TITLE: Floatpoint
    AUTHOR: Emily Short
    EMAIL: emshort SP@G mindspring.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 7
    SUPPORTS: Glulx interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/glulx/floatpoint/Floatpoint.zblorb
    VERSION: Release 1

    Floatpoint is about a planet populated by genetically-engineered humans who want
    to come back to earth, or something like that. I don't remember exactly because,
    frankly, I didn't care. The author never made me feel like the things I was
    doing or the situation itself really mattered. This seems strange, because the
    whole point of the game is to figure out what's going on and decide what to do
    about it. But while I was certainly interested in the game as a puzzle, I ended
    up not caring about it as a story.

    The writing is good, although some of the descriptions were a bit long-winded
    for my tastes. I was probably playing just before bed, though, so that might
    have made me less patient with the descriptions than I otherwise would have
    been. The game could also have used a little more technical work. I ran into a
    few bugs and unimplemented things, and the whole game ran really slowly, with
    long pauses after each command. None of these things were a big deal- I even got
    used to the pauses after a while- but they made the game feel unpolished.

    Although I didn't like the game all that much, there was one aspect I really did
    like. Floatpoint used two devices to help communicate the story, and both of
    them worked well for me. They were a message system used to communicate with
    some distant NPCs, and a computer database containing information from your
    predecessor.

    The message system involves a console in the "communications room" and a beeper
    that you carry around with you. When someone sends you a message, your beeper
    alerts you to the fact. You can then go to the communications room and use the
    console to read and reply to any messages that you've received. The replies are
    written automatically; you only choose whether or not to send them. Often, you
    will get a response to your reply a while after you send it, so you end up
    engaging in some good sized conversations this way.

    These messages arrive every so often through most of the game, and that's what I
    really liked about the system. For one thing, the "message waiting" beeper
    pleasantly interrupted my other exploration, breaking up what might have become
    monotonous otherwise. And I found that I anticipated the answers to my messages
    in the same way that I anticipate an email from someone, which added to the fun
    of reading them when they finally arrived. The message system did a good job of
    keeping me engaged with the game.

    The other device that I enjoyed playing with was a computer database in which I
    could look up journal entries from one of the NPCs and information about the
    game's background. This is surprising, because normally I *hate* consultable
    objects in adventure games. It feels like I'm playing guess-the-noun, and I'm
    always afraid that I've missed a noun that was important. (And often I'm right.)

    But the database in Floatpoint avoids this problem in two related ways: most
    keywords will bring up multiple articles, and most articles have multiple
    keywords attached to them. The first is nice because you can look up a person's
    name (for example) and see everything in the database related to them. Then, if
    one of the articles that comes up mentions something else interesting that's
    related to the character, you can look that up and see what the database has to
    say about it. I had a lot of fun searching through the database this way. And I
    wasn't nearly as worried as I usually am about missing something, because with
    multiple keywords for each article, I figured I was pretty sure to run into any
    important ones eventually. (And in fact I did.) To me, playing with the database
    was the best part of the whole game.

    Even though I didn't care for the story, Floatpoint was worthwhile just to play
    with these toys. And hey, you might like the story better than I did. So if you
    have any taste for story-driven IF, I'd certainly recommend taking a look at
    this game.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Kent Corall (silver_raditz SP@G yahoo.com)

    TITLE: Game Producer!
    AUTHOR: Jason Bergman
    E-MAIL: loonyjason SP@G gmail.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 6
    SUPPORTS: Z-Code interpreters
    Availability: freeware; IF-Archive
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/zcode/producer/producer.z5
    Version: 1

    As the Interactive Fiction community continues to grow, we head further away
    from the puzzle-driven dungeon crawls and more into genre-scattered stories, the
    occasional pioneering gem will surface for all to enjoy.

    The much underrated Game Producer! shouldn't be judged on it's highly exictable
    and hobby categorized name, but rather the high quality of the game.

    One of the most notable features of GP! is it's time feature, which is integral
    to the story. Depending on whether you choose an easy, medium, or hard mode
    (which is geniously integrated into the story via dream sequence), you wake up
    at a certain time. Then, as you reach your company, you can use three different
    energy sources to keep you awake. Using Orange Juice requires the most frequent
    refills to keep you running, but time goes by slower. The energy drink is the
    exact opposite, with very little need to refill but makes time go by at an
    alarming pace. Coffee is a nice mediator between these two extremes, and is
    easily the most recommendable.

    When you first reach your store, you have a meeting with the "Big Man", or the
    boss of your game company. Here, you learn that you have one of three video
    games (It's randomly generated, but the game remains the same. Just name
    changes.) to complete and ship before midnight. With that, you leave his office
    and take the game head-on.

    GP! has certain goals that you need to meet, but does not dictate in which order
    you do them, although there are a few time-specific events (such as the video
    game journalist arriving at 4:00 PM). The two puzzles in the game are small and
    easily solvable, yet are still pleasant to play. Basically, you play as Mr. Fix
    -It who needs to solve everyone's problems so they can do their jobs, such as
    helping the Steve from the QA Pit fix the overheated server.

    Although the game is timed, Easy Mode allows for a very leisurely pace (which,
    for thrill-seekers, can turn into Hell if you play Hard first time around). The
    world is small but nicely detailed, with a few little jokes hidden within (such
    as a calculator that has 1337 on it), but mostly straight-forward. A nice
    addition is the video game journalist's notepad that can be read, which involves
    a couple video game jokes. Or you can be more productive and test your game for
    bugs (in which there are quite a few), but this adds up to quite a bit of time.

    GP! also has a dynamic ending. Even if you finished the game with shining stars
    with every thing maxed out, your game can still flop. Bergman claims this is a
    rare ending, but I got it on my first try. Fortunately, you can just undo that
    until you get a satisfactory ending. Similarly, if you create a monstrosity of a
    video game, the sales will reflect and so will the Boss's reaction. The only
    complaint about the ending is that the action you have to commit to end the game
    isn't very obvious, so I had to consult the walkthrough on that one.

    Yet GP! is not perfect, mainly because of its boring NPCs. The video game
    journalist is a one-dimensional jerk, whereas Steve doesn't even have a
    personality. The characters serve mostly as tools to further his purposes, so
    you don't really walk away attached to any character, even the PC.

    Although a couple quirks exist such as small gender-specific events (there are
    only two minor instances, though, and these have the same affect as the other
    gender's event) exist, the game is fairly linear, and once the game has been
    satisfactorily beaten, the game brings little replay value. Yet while you do
    play it, it'll be an extremely fun endeavor. It's a shame this thing only
    reached number twelve in the IF Comp. The author shows much promise, so I'll
    look forward to any future works.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Paul Lee (bainespal SP@G yahoo.com)

    TITLE: Green Falls
    AUTHOR: Paul Panks (writing as Dunric)
    E-MAIL: dunric SP@G yahoo.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Custom
    Supports: DOS/Windows
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://www.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/windows/greenfl/greenfl.exe
    Version: 1

    Despite being simple in every respect of the word, I rather enjoyed this small
    adventure and role-playing game.  Although "Green Falls" features a bare,
    cliched plotline, the hack-and-slash combat and simple adventure-quest feel work
    in this game better than in most like it, due in part to many of the room
    descriptions which say a lot in few words and paint a vivid picture.
    Additionally, the map is well laid out, and the geography gives the impression
    of a vast area without many locations.

    Having said this, the game has a number of problems that cause frustration and
    make it more difficult to appreciate.  First off, the parser is weak; "take"
    cannot even be used as a synonym for "get."  Not only is the concept of the game
    simple, but its mechanics are often obtrusively undeveloped and under-prepared.
    Cases in point: at one occasion the game told me that I could see "a(n)
    gauntlets," and armor can be covering more than one hundred percent of your
    body. As mentioned above, the room descriptions are typically good, but
    sometimes they are illogical, such as one description which mentions "useful
    items" that are unimplemented or another that has dialogue in the description.
    In fact, no objects not listed after the room description are implemented at
    all, I believe, though that one case was directly misleading.  Also, at times
    the text breaks at the end of a line in mid-word, which is jarring regardless of
    the fact that usually there are nice margins.

    The main point of the game (outside of the objective of the player given in the
    shallow back story) is to kill monsters and find better armor and weapons,
    something that probably turns many people off immediately.  However, the
    monsters and the pieces of armor are distributed well, so that you will probably
    become just strong enough to slay the last big bad beastie by the time you reach
    the concluding part of the game.  There are no major puzzles outside of monster
    bashing, but exploring different regions after you've increased your might is a
    kind of puzzle itself, and if you are not careful in your approach, you will
    find yourself getting killed more often then not to great frustration, as I did
    the first time I played.  If you cannot reconcile yourself to the kind of game
    that "Green Falls" is, you will almost certainly find it not worth your time.
    If on the other hand you can, I would say that the good layout of content and
    vivid room descriptions make it good enough to give a try despite its problems.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Mike Harris (M.Harris SP@G spi-bpo.com)

    TITLE:  The Journey of the King
    AUTHOR: Peter Nepstad
    EMAIL: petern SP@G illuminatedlantern.com
    DATE: November 26, 2006
    PARSER: TADS 2
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware
    URL: http://www.illuminatedlantern.com/if/games/the_journey_of_the_king.html

    Peter Nepstad has based The Journey of the King on the Lord Dunsany story of the
    same name, originally published in 1906.  In the "About" file included with the
    zipped download he notes that the story is now in the public domain in the
    United States and helpfully includes a link to the story in the Project
    Gutenberg archives, http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/8183

    One does not need to be familiar with the story to successfully play the game.
    In fact, the author's primary purpose would seem to be to familiarize those who
    might not know the tale nor Lord Dunsany's work in general.  The titular PC
    talks to the NPCs in a menu-driven format, gradually and interactively telling
    the tale.

    One chooses to hear prophesies of various sages within the kingdom and finally
    choose among them.  During the course of this one encounters some puzzles, none
    too difficult.  It's possible to put the game in an unwinnable state by hearing
    the prophecies in incorrect order - or perhaps more accurately, I managed to get
    myself impossibly stuck a couple of times.  In any case, it's not much of a
    hardship to restart the game and replay should this happen, if one doesn't mind
    verbosity.  The story in this case served me well as a semi-walkthrough and
    hints file.

    The play itself is bug free, with no guess the verb problems.  Indeed, beyond
    "TALK TO" and "EXAMINE" there's very little else to do, with only a scant
    handful of objects available for manipulation.

    If you happen to be open to appreciating Lord Dunsany's very florid 19th Century
    writing style you'll find the game very enjoyable and actually a rather clever
    way of getting painlessly through some fairly dense prose.  The mood is well set
    and conversational menu commands, such as that to your faithful Cupbearer, e.g.
    "I would drink the wine of my Ancestors, so that I may feel more at ease" suit
    the tone of the tale.  If on the other hand you prefer your PCs to be less
    compelled by a narrative, or prefer crisper, more modern prose you'll likely not
    find the game to your taste.

    Out of 10 I give the game a 3 for simplicity and a 6 overall.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: DJ Hastings (dj.hastings SP@G wavecable.com)

    TITLE: Labyrinth
    AUTHOR: Sami Preuninger
    EMAIL: samantha_casanova SP@G glic.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 6
    SUPPORTS: Z-code interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/zcode/labyrinth/labyrinth.z8
    VERSION: Release 1

    Labyrinth consists of a series of puzzles set in a maze of sorts. Not a "twisty
    little passages" maze where the directions are non-reversible and the rooms are
    indistinguishable. No, this maze is logical enough; the main difficulty is
    figuring out how to get from room to room, and I think I would really have
    enjoyed it if it hadn't been for a small problem.

    That problem was the room descriptions: they completely confused me! Each wall
    in a room is of a different colour, as well as the floor and ceiling, and there
    are several doorways from each room, usually in strange positions like upside
    down against the ceiling. These doorways were my main problem; they are
    described as "archways," and when I first read about "an archway halfway up the
    south wall, extending from its western edge toward the middle of the wall," I
    imagined a stone arch sticking out into the room. The archway is really a
    doorway through the wall, with its base against the west wall instead of against
    the floor, but I didn't figure this out until I was quite a ways through the
    game using the walkthrough, and by that point I had already spoiled the rest of
    the puzzle.

    The other puzzles were mostly things like Nim or a cipher that would work just
    as well on paper. I didn't like the inclusion of the cipher. Ciphers essentially
    say to me, "pause the game while you go figure out this puzzle, and come back
    here when you're finished." And it was a keyword cipher, which I have no idea
    how to solve, so I never would have made it past this puzzle on my own. On the
    other hand, I did enjoy the "magic number" puzzle. It's another "go solve this
    and come back" puzzle, but the difference is that I enjoyed going and solving
    it. I probably wouldn't include it in an adventure game, because someone who
    didn't like that sort of thing would be just as irritated by it as I was by the
    cipher, but I still had fun with it.

    In the end, a game like Labyrinth stands or falls on its puzzles. Labyrinth's
    "maze" is creative and with a bit more clarity would make an excellent setting
    for a collection of unique and interesting puzzles. Unfortunately, most of
    Labyrinth's puzzles don't fit that description. There are a couple of
    exceptions, but they aren't enough to make the game worthwhile.

    From: David Jones (drj SP@G pobox.com)

    A word of warning.  This game has a problem when played with the Zoom based
    interpreters (including Gargoyle and Spatterlight).  Play with Frotz.  As far as
    I know, Preuninger is working on a new version that presumably won't have these
    problems.

    Another word of warning: this game is almost pure puzzle.  Right from the very
    first description: "A Sweet-Smelling Room: The room is a perfect cube, about 30
    feet on a side.  The ceiling is yellow and the floor is purple.  The north wall
    is blue, and the eastern wall is green.  To the south, the wall is orange, and
    the western wall is red.  The walls are bare of ornament, and no furniture
    occupies the room." we can tell that we are entering into a world where certain
    things, like the colour of the walls, are going to important.  The fact that the
    floor and ceiling are described probably hints at the importance of the third
    dimension.  Our suspicions are immediately reinforced by the following
    paragraphs that describe in meticulous detail the doors in the room.  Most of
    which are not in their usual orientations and are situated in inaccessible
    portions of the walls and ceiling.  It all adds up to a strong reference to
    Escher and The Cube (the entertainingly low-budget movie).

    The game consists of a sequence of puzzles embedded into the framework of a text
    adventure.  Some would say that many of the puzzles would do better without the
    wrapper.  I'm not sure, I think what wrapper there is adds character to the
    game.  You're not merely pulling levers and pressing buttons in some abstract
    puzzle, you play the part of a trying-to-be-cool maths professor (we can tell
    because X ME reveals that the PC is into rock climbing and air guitar).  Each
    room has a distinctive smell, this is very handy for orienting yourself, but
    these are not mere scent markers on your map, they too add character: "The room
    smells rather strongly of wet dog.  You reaffirm your decision never to acquire
    a pet.".

    The help text says "I'll just say that drawing a map would be helpful".  Well,
    that _is_ true, and you definitely should draw a map.  I drew three.  It's one
    of those games where you realise, perhaps with horror, perhaps with glee, that
    your map drawing efforts are documenting completely the wrong thing and you'd be
    better of starting over with a different sort of map.  In actual fact the game
    isn't all that big, and the map isn't that complex, but much of game, the
    central puzzle as it were, is figuring out exactly what is going on.  This
    puzzle involves transforming the geography in quite a cool way (let's just say
    that NORTH doesn't always mean the same thing), and you'll probably have needed
    to paid attention in your algebra class to fully understand it.

    The puzzles are hard; as well as the main geometry puzzle there are the usual
    object composition puzzles and riddles, and the rather less traditional, at
    least in text adventures, game of nim and a cipher (actually I wouldn't be
    surprised if nim and ciphers cropped up in some very old school games, but
    they're not common now).  There's even an last lousy point puzzle (which I
    haven't got). Preuninger includes hints and a walkthrough (as separate HTML
    files); you may be able to finish using them, but they won't necessarily
    enlighten you.

    There are those who would say that the game is too puzzle-heavy, it lacks
    story (it doesn't actually, but the story _is_ more of a cliched veneer than
    anything else), the descriptions are too mechanical.  They miss the point.
    Labyrinth stands out like a lightning-rod for gaming, it deliberately and
    directly opposes the modern style of story led interactive fiction.  What it
    lacks in quality and finesse it more than makes up for in reviving freshness.
    In addition I suspect that the game has a little bit more heart in it than most
    of its detractors realise.  In how many games can you voluntarily FART ?  No, I
    don't really want an answer to that question.

    With my tongue in my cheek I would say that I found this game a refreshing
    change from all the diplomat-on-an-alien-planet and mutant-spider games in this
    year's comp.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Jimmy Maher (maher SP@G grandecom.net)

    TITLE: Last Resort
    AUTHOR: Jim Aikin
    EMAIL: editor SP@G musicwords.net
    DATE: December 2, 2006
    PARSER: Inform 6
    SUPPORTS: Glulx interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware; IF Archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-archive/games/glulx/LastResort.zip
    VERSION: Release 1

    In his newsgroup discussions of his new game and on his webpage devoted to it,
    Mr. Aikin set it up as something bold and fairly experimental.  "Last Resort,"
    he tells us, "is an attempt to use the medium of interactive fiction for a
    serious story with an actual plot."  I thus downloaded the game expecting to
    find something that, successful or not, would at least push the envelope of the
    possible.  I was surprised to find instead a well put-together, well-tested, and
    well-written work of IF... but one that does little or nothing really new with
    the form.  It's not that Mr. Aikin was being dishonest.  Last Resort IS a
    serious story with an actual plot.  It's just that there have been plenty of
    serious stories with actual plots before in IF, and Mr. Aikin's tone had somehow
    made me feel that he meant something new in using those words.

    Be that as it may, there is nothing here that advances the form in any new
    directions.  Luckily, though, there is a lot to like about this one.  In this
    age of bite-sized IF, a big, solidly designed effort like this is worthy of
    celebration on its own merits.

    The plot casts the player as a fourteen year old girl from New York who has been
    dragged off to the tumbledown resort camp of Eternal Springs in Mississippi by
    her spinster aunt.  Once there, she quickly begin to realize that things are not
    right.  Evil is afoot!  The resort is actually a front for a demon-worshipping
    cult, and in some four hours of game time she will be sacrificed... unless she
    can thwart the plans of the cult.

    Like much -- arguably too much -- IF before it, Last Resort settles itself
    firmly into the genre of Lovecraftian horror.  I find it surprising that so many
    IF authors continue to go down this road, as Anchorhead nailed the genre so well
    that it seems to me that virtually anything else -- including (retroactively)
    even Infocom's The Lurking Horror -- is likely to come up short in comparison.
    Anyway, I tend to find a more understated, psychological approach to horror
    infinitely more chilling than Lovecraft's wild ravings about unnamable horrors
    from other dimensions gibbering EVILY.  Even a bit of good old Satan worshipping
    would have gone down pretty well, and this was in fact the direction I initially
    thought the game was going in when I found, first, a Bible with particularly
    violent and disturbing passages marked, and then a rather creepy, thoroughly
    unholy priest.  I had decidedly mixed feelings when I realized what direction it
    was actually going in.

    And so, perhaps inevitably and certainly not unexpectedly, the plot of Last
    Resort suffers in comparison with Anchorhead.  I think that much of the problem
    is down to a failure to maintain dramatic tension.  The game is indeed, as
    advertised by Aikin, non-linear, but I'm not sure that its story is the better
    for it.  Basically, the player can wander freely over its fairly extensive
    terrain -- for which Mr. Aikin has helpfully provided a PDF map -- right from
    the beginning, attempting to solve the variety of puzzles that block her from
    thwarting the cult's plans and effecting her escape from the resort.  There are
    a few timed and triggered events, but not enough to make the game feel like a
    satisfying story rather than just a collection of static obstacles to conquer.
    The plot has no real climax as all.  If she solves all of the puzzles in time,
    she leaves the island on which the resort is situated and it's game over,
    accompanied by a massive case of anti-climax.  If not, she is sacrificed and
    that's that.  Something more is definitely needed here.

    But if the plot is a bit thin, there is much else to appreciate.  The puzzles
    are sometimes difficult, but generally satisfying.  The writing is detailed and
    evocative, and the scenery is well-implemented throughout.  Eternal Springs in
    all its overheated, dilapidated splendor feels like a real place.

    Two things really set Last Resort off from games like it from five or ten years
    ago.  One is the aforementioned level of scenery implementation.  The other is
    the NPCs.  There are quite a few of them here, all vividly described and
    memorable, if sometimes a bit cliched.  They aren't terribly active -- most stay
    in the same place pretty much throughout the game -- but they have a surprising
    amount to say.  Almost any reasonable query that these people SHOULD know
    something about they DO.  Inform unfortunately does not (yet) have anything of
    quite the sophistication of the TADS 3 conversation model, but Mr. Aikin has
    made good use of the tools he does have.  This contributed greatly to my
    enjoyment of the game, and is I suspect the main reason that the it ballooned to
    a size too big for the Z-Machine to contain.  I hate to think of the amount of
    work that must have gone into Mr. Aikin's characters.

    Last Resort is not a terribly easy game.  As mentioned previously, there is a
    time limit, which is something I generally have mixed feelings about.  The game
    is quite generous as such things go, though, allowing plenty of time for
    exploration.  I actually never ran out of clock in my time with the game,
    although I was always aware of the time limit and thus occasionally restored to
    an earlier point after spending too much time going down some fruitless path or
    another.

    It is also quite possible to make the game unwinnable.  The game will not warn
    its player in any obvious way when this happens, but just continue merrily
    onward.  I think that the reasonably careful player will, however, generally be
    able to recognize these situations.  The key here is to approach Last Resort as
    a text adventure, not a piece of interactive literature, contrary as this may be
    to the expectations created by Mr. Aikin's own comments on his game.  Hint: If
    you find yourself asking why no one comments on the fact that you are carrying
    around several dozen bizarre, non-related items in a huge sack like a fourteen
    year old Santa Claus, or how this young girl is able to lift this much assorted
    junk in the first place, you are officially in the wrong frame of mind.

    Luckily, I like text adventures a lot, and this is, all things considered, a
    pretty darn good one.  Together with my girlfriend I was able to solve all but
    two of its puzzles.  At least one of those two -- the final step in clearing the
    dog away from the shed door -- I thought was a bit dodgy, but then every game
    seems to have at least one.  Overall, Last Resort is a fine piece of work that
    will likely consume several evenings of happy adventuring.  All but the most
    puzzle-adverse should definitely give it a go.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: David Jones (drj SP@G pobox.com)

    TITLE: Pirate Adventure
    AUTHOR: Alexis Adams and Scott Adams
    E-mail: msadams SP@G msadams.com
    DATE: 1978
    Parser: Scott Adams (2 word)
    Supports: Originally custom format, since reverse engineered and translated to
    Z-code and others
    Availability: IF-archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-archive/games/zcode/adamsinform.zip

    I'm playing using the zcode translations of the games found in scott-
    adams/games/zcode/adamsinform.zip in the IF Archive.

    Pirate Adventure uses a split-screen style where the top portion of the screen
    is permanently given over to displaying the location description ("I'm in a Flat
    in london" [sic]), the available exits, and the visible items.  I remember, from
    way back when, that when I was playing this game on a VIC-20 the split-screen
    effect was quite convenient; the VIC-20 had a text display of 22x23, and games
    rarely implemented scrollback (since memory used for scrollback would eat into
    the memory used to hold the game description, all of which had to be kept in
    RAM).  So it was actually quite nice to have the equivalent of LOOK permanently
    displayed.  These days the split-screen effect is more disturbing; I often use
    long windows so my focus keeps having to shift from where I'm typing (at the
    bottom) to the room description (at the top).  Many commands (eg GET SNEAKERS)
    have no response, they simply update the room description. This change is
    sometimes easy to miss, especially if it happens in one's peripheral vision or
    during a saccade.

    Needless to say the writing is extremely economical, but that doesn't really
    excuse the mistakes that are all too common: its/it's confusion, missing
    punctuation, and misplaced capital letters.

    Parsing is two word.  LOOK IN SACK and PUT THE TORCH OUT are way too complex.
    Forget the luxury of having synonyms or helpful hints from the parser.  A
    typical example that crops up early in the game is that there are stairs in the
    initial location, but neither UP nor DOWN works, GO STAIRS being the required
    invocation.  In the location at the other end of the stairs, DOWN works to
    return to the first location.  Is Adams just being stubborn here?  Or is he
    introducing the player to the required mechanics to solve later parts of the
    game?  I think I'd rather give Adams the benefit of the doubt here and say that
    requiring players to use GO STAIRS instead of UP is getting them to practice a
    puzzle in simple and obvious form so that later on less obvious uses for GO X
    can be introduced without the player thinking it harsh or unfair.

    The parser abbreviates all words to 3 letters and this somewhat makes up for the
    lack of now traditional abbreviations such as X (EXA) and I (INV).  Despite the
    parser's simplicity it does implement automatic disambiguation for some objects.
    CRA is recognised as "Sack of crackers" or "narrow crack" as appropriate,
    similarly with WIN.

    When we review an old game like this we are confronted with questions of
    purpose.  Why are we playing an old game?  We can play to gain some insight into
    the history, to see what it was like to play games of that era (although the
    experience will of course fall short because of the lack of context, just as
    attempts at, say, medieval cooking do.  That doesn't mean such attempts
    shouldn't be made of course); we can play to see what value such games hold now,
    as objects of entertainment; finally, we can play to see what value such games
    hold for the creators of modern works.  What lessons can we learn from this
    game?

    As a form of entertainment there is really very little to keep the modern player
    at the keyboard: no lavish descriptions; a fair number spelling mistakes and
    similar signs of inadequate proofreading; no cunning plots; the puzzles aren't
    particularly deep.

    It's worthwhile to compare the implementation of a bag in Pirate Adventure with
    how it would likely be implemented today.  Today it would be implemented as a
    container.  The player would be able to open it, close, take things out, put
    things in.  Adams avoids the complexities inherent in container objects
    (capacity, inclusion in self, description of contents, reaching beyond when the
    PC is inside, etc) by simply having OPEN BAG create a new object in the location
    with the response "Something falls out".  Adams has been spared the expense of
    implementing containers, and the player has been spared the pointless
    exploration of a containment simulation.  In the modern approach, implementing
    the BAG as a container, OPEN BAG would yield the response "Revealing an X" or
    similar, and GET X would get the object in question.  Adams solution has all the
    elegance of the modern implementation, but at a fraction of the cost (in terms
    of programming and debugging).  In either case the player types exactly the same
    sequence of commands, OPEN BAG. GET X.  What the player has lost is the ability
    to PUT X IN BAG (that would require a preposition in the parser), but that
    doesn't seem like a huge loss given that containers in adventure games are often
    used to merely delay the player in finding some object (that is, they are a
    barrier to getting some object from the container rather than something into
    which the player might usefully stow an object).  The lesson here is that
    simulation for simulation's sake is pointless.  If you implement a complex
    object then its complexity should be motivation by having an interesting purpose
    in the game.  One recent example which fails this test is the implementation of
    pockets in Eric Eve's competition release of The Elysium Enigma.  The effect of
    the pockets was to hide from the player objects carried by the PC (a false, and
    I suspect largely unintentional) widening on the player / PC gap).  I'm happy to
    say that Eric Eve has  made a new release which fixes this and brings this
    aspect up to the high quality of the rest of The Elysium Enigma.

    Structurally the game follows the classic trinity of beginning, middle, and end.
     The beginning consists of 5 locations in the London flat and lasts until the
    player discovers how to get to the islands.  The middle bit provides most of the
    game and takes places on an island with rather more than 5 locations (though you
    will also be revisiting the flat).  A final section (on another island) is
    reached after the solution to a key puzzle on the first island.  The
    anticipation of solving that key puzzle is quite good and solving it yields a
    genuine sense of achievement which is sadly deflated by the game's very
    lackluster response: "CONGRATULATIONS !!! But your Adventure is not over yet...
    " (that's Pirate Adventure being prolix).  When Pirate Adventure was first
    published the three-part structure had yet to become time honoured; Adams did
    well to note that the theatrical device could be employed here.  Sadly the final
    part of the game is a bit of a let-down.  Like many games (modern and old) it
    feels like the author ran out of time, steam, or implementation space,
    consequently the final part feels under-implemented, disappointing, and buggy
    (the one bug I found concerns an object found in the final section).

    Although old Pirate Adventure avoids a lot of puzzle cliches.  Several objects
    in the game have multiple uses; some change state and are used in different
    states. One of the NPCs both provides clues and is used directly to solve a
    later puzzle.  One NPC is an obstacle early on in the game, but needs to be
    exploited to overcome a puzzle later in the game.  Although some cliches are
    avoided lots are included: instant death; no UNDO; some puzzles require, for no
    obvious reason, repeating certain actions.  Some of puzzles seem pretty
    reasonable, others seem a bit arbitrary and you can easily unwittingly enter
    unwinnable states.  Fortunately the game isn't very large so restarting isn't
    very unpleasant and often leads to discovering something new.  There is an
    inventory limit (it never forms the crux of a puzzle, it just means more toing
    and froing) and a torch that can be exhausted.

    Pirate Adventure packs quite a lot of puzzles into its small space; the sketch
    of the puzzle-dependency diagram (DM4's "lattice diagram") that I started making
    reveals a surprisingly complex and interesting structure.  The effect is one
    that I find all too rare in lots of games: there are always several avenues to
    explore, always a few objects whose purpose you haven't fathomed, and a few
    strategies that remain to be tried.  There are quite a few pleasing moment when
    you realise that certain objects have multiple uses.  On the other hand I know
    of no puzzle in Pirate Adventure that has an alternate solution (apart from a
    trivial rephrasing); it's a notable lack in Pirate Adventure.

    The setting of the game, a tropical island (well, the game doesn't say it's
    tropical but let's assume it is), is both a strength and a weakness.  The text
    in the game is extremely minimal, yet the setting manages to be quite vivid.
    Adams achieves this primarily by placing the game in a setting that is familiar
    to most players: the classic desert island of adventure stories like Treasure
    Island and Robinson Crusoe.  Such stories were probably read by (or read to) the
    player as a child; the island takes on nostalgic and perhaps slightly magical
    qualities in the player's mind as a result.  It takes very few words for the
    player to be transported to a fantasy island with golden beaches, inviting
    lagoons, huts made from palm leaves, and a cave system in cliffs of soft rock.
    Those parts of the game are fine.  It's the additions that break the spell.  The
    cave system has a toolshed inside it apparently equipped with about half the
    necessary materials to build a boat, but the only access to the shed is either
    via a small crack or past a crocodile infested pit.  How did the equipment get
    in the shed?  How does the crocodiles' pit fill with water?  Why are the keys to
    a pirate's chest in [LOCATION WITHHELD]?  Historically this was totally
    acceptable, expected even, but these days many players would find it
    distasteful.

    Designers would do well to briefly dip into Pirate Adventure to observe how it
    manages to create a solid and evocative setting with so few words, and how the
    puzzles and objects are interlinked with such economy.  But that is all.  Pirate
    Adventure has little to commend itself to the modern player, though it was great
    in its day.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: Dark Star (darkstar SP@G infodarkness.com)

    Title:  The Reliques of Tolti-Aph
    Author:  Graham Nelson
    Email:  graham@gnelson.demon.co.uk
    Date:  March 2, 2006
    Parser:  Inform 7
    Supports:  Z-code interpreters
    Availability: Freeware; Author's Website
    URL:  http://inform-fiction.org/I7Downloads/Examples/rota/
    Version:  1

    The Reliques of Tolti-Aph is the latest game by Graham Nelson, written to
    showcase some of the new features of Inform 7.  It is not traditional IF, rather
    an RPG with IF elements.  It implements a modified D&D engine referred to as
    Woodpulp & Wyverns (W&W).  The implementation of the engine is impressive, but
    the gameplay itself falls a little short: it fails to adhere to its own
    conventions and several of the puzzles have unconventional solutions.  (Thank
    goodness for David Welbourn's walkthrough!)  It's not balanced, it's not fair,
    and it can be very frustrating for the player.  Play at your own risk!

    The first thing that the game needs is a manual, and ideally a tutorial as well,
    covering concepts such as scroll creation, spells and how to create a sanctuary
    where you can go to retreat and rest.  Understanding the game is more than
    learning about combat, and I suspect many players will end up resorting to the
    walkthrough in order to get the hang of it.

    One good feature is the ability to retreat (i.e. run away) during a fight. If
    you get away, you can go back to your sanctuary, meditate (heal), and save.
    This is just as well, as meditating and saving can only be done in a sanctuary,
    and UNDO has been completely disabled.  While not allowing UNDO makes sense, I
    do not think it's a good idea to disable save, except perhaps during combat.
    Some other RPGs do this, but it usually doesn't work, and I've seen it corrected
    later by a patch.

    My biggest complaint is that your strength does not increase as your level
    increases.  This goes against one of the most basic rules of the RPG, and makes
    some of the creatures almost impossible to kill.  The wyvern, for example, can
    kill you in one shot, no matter what level you are on.  There is a spell to get
    past it, but this is a RPG and you earn experience by killing creatures and
    casting spells.  In a hard boss fight like this, you should earn more experience
    from killing the beast than casting a simple spell.  Overall, the game feels
    unbalanced: you face sudden death far too often.  Either the monsters need less
    bite or the player's defensive bonus needs to be brought up, or both. In a good
    RPG, you win most fights and only have to work harder on a small number of boss
    fights.

    Then there's the random maze.  That's bad enough, but the strength problem makes
    every fight feel like a boss fight.  Also, with spells needing components to be
    able to cast them, it becomes impossible to fight the monsters using your
    spells.  If you try, you face a real inventory management problem as you're
    always running around looking for scraps of metal so you can fire off your magic
    missiles.  This is a bit much, and I had to give up at this point.  I think it
    would be better to remove the component feature from the engine altogether; the
    mana cost is enough of a penalty.

    Another problem with the game is that many of the puzzles are under-clued, and
    don't follow any sort of pattern. For example, early on I had to write on a
    blank parchment with a metal feather to create a scroll.  "Ah," I thought, "this
    is how you make a scroll."  I never did it again.  Later on, I had to look up a
    saying in the diary and write it on a pyramid.  Why couldn't a monster have been
    protecting a blank parchment?  Then it would have been obvious that I should
    write on the parchment to create the scroll I needed.  Having established a
    convention, the game should carry it through.  In addition, when you learn a new
    spell this way, the game doesn't even tell you that you've learned it:  you have
    to look it up in your spell book.  The player should know when they've done
    something right.

    The game has an awkward dual personality, trying to combine conventional IF
    puzzles with the RPG elements, and doesn't quite pull it off.  There are some
    great puzzles here, but some of them are so hard that they disrupt the flow.  As
    an RPG, I feel it should have been more action-oriented, with IF puzzles that
    don't act as roadblocks.

    A pet peeve of mine is that the game is not always clear about which exits are
    available.  This was particularly noticeable in the maze, where there are no
    room descriptions for the tunnels, and some of the room names (e.g. NORTH-EAST
    BEND) are misleading.  More than once I had to resort to trying random
    directions.

    Technically, the game is very polished, and the only bug I found happened upon
    death when trying to cast a spell.  Once, when I tried to make a sanctuary the
    sand coming out of the door killed me, and the game responded with:

    Would you like to RESTART, RESTORE a saved game or QUIT?

    >restore

    That enchantment cannot be cast at anything.

    The game would not let me restore, and I had to restart before I could restore
    my saved game.

    Overall, I think the idea of an IF RPG offers some great possibilities.  Some
    things need to be changed within the engine, and a few things need to be worked
    out within the game itself, but this could definitely become a solid game engine
    for others to build on.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    From: David Jones (drj SP@G pobox.com)

    TITLE: The Tower of the Elephant
    AUTHOR: Tor Andersson
    E-MAIL: tor.andersson SP@G gmail.com
    DATE: October 1, 2006
    Parser: Inform 7
    Supports: Z-code
    Availability: IF-archive
    URL: http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-
    archive/games/competition2006/zcode/tower/The%20Tower%20of%20the%
    20Elephant.zblorb
    Version: Release 1 / Serial number 060922 / Inform 7 build 3Z95 (I6/v6.31 lib
    6/11N)

    "I have seen no guards. The walls would be easy to climb. Why has not somebody
    stolen this secret gem?" the game begins (well almost).  Indeed, why not?  It's
    the perfect excuse to begin an adventure game.

    The game, it turns out, is based on the Conan story by Robert E. Howard.  You
    get to play the part of Conan the Barbarian as he goes to the Elephant Tower of
    Yara the priest to steal the source of his magic, the Elephant's Heart jewel.
    I've never read any of the Conan stories, though I am vaguely familiar with
    style.

    The writing is a real treat, vivid and undemanding.  Like pulp fiction should
    be.  Most of the writing is Howard's, though Andersson has done a very competent
    job of taking the words from their original linear format and embedding them
    into a text adventure.

    The Tower of the Elephant is well implemented, with close to no outright bugs,
    and is generally polished.  I think the game could definitely benefit from
    implementing a few more scenery nouns.  In a literary adaptation this is, of
    course, a tricky business; how far should Andersson go in adding new
    descriptions?  Well, at least as far as the coping, the sward, the shrubbery
    (these examples from the first few locations).  In the Infocom era, this would
    have gone without a mention, but these days I think people expect a bit more.
    In a way though, I find it quite refreshing; it focuses the mind on the
    essentials.  The same complaint exists in the domain of verbs. Obvious
    manipulations of implemented objects are not always implemented.  You have a
    sword but you cannot draw nor wield it.  The following extract concerning a
    jewel is typical (There are lots of jewels in this game.  Some of them you can
    take, some of them you cannot):

    >> x stone

    A great round jewel, clear as crimson crystal.

    >> look through stone

    You find nothing of interest.

    As someone who was not familiar with the story I would say that the game
    sometimes fails to mark "the way forward" with sufficient clues.  This is mostly
    only a problem early on when room descriptions fail to describe available exits.
    Really, I quibble because a player isn't likely to forget which way the tower is
    (unless they are deliberately wasting time trying lots of different things out
    like I was), and it's a sufficiently small game that it's never a huge problem
    anyway.  Also, the EXITS command is implemented.

    Epistemic object naming comes into play.  An NPC thief is referred to as thief
    until you learn his name (optional), thence he is referred to using his name.
    Managing the player's knowledge is always a bit tricky, and later on the game
    falters when you meet Yag-kosha.  Yag-kosha never directly introduces himself
    directly, indeed at one point he addresses Yag-kosha as if talking to someone
    else, but the game immediately refers to Yag-kosha and apparently assumes you
    know the referent.  I did briefly wonder whether in Yag-kosha's language "Yag-
    kosha" was a pronoun that could be used to refer to self and others equally
    (like some uses of "we" in English).

    One of the puzzles, the spider combat, I found annoying.  Of the many things
    that a player could try only a few are implemented.  Not implementing DODGE and
    PARRY seems reasonable enough, at least the game is clear on that matter, but
    there are some actions that the game describes, but which cannot be executed
    voluntarily.  For example at one point the game says (in response to my not
    doing anything positive in attacking the spider) "You leap high, and the spider
    passes beneath you, wheels and charges back", but I cannot JUMP OVER SPIDER; I
    can JUMP, but I get the library response.  The required actions are not
    particular hard to guess, but they're not particularly well clued either.  The
    combat scene is on a timer (eventually the spider _will_ kill you), so I suspect
    most players will be restoring many times before they defeat the spider.
    Contrast this with the spider combat in Tales of the Traveling Swordsman where
    the actions are better clued (in fact, the clueing is progressive), and the game
    isn't quite so cruel at killing the player off.  It turns out there are
    solutions to the game that avoid the entire spider combat, so maybe it doesn't
    matter if I found it hard?  Well, that would be a more reasonable defense if it
    was possible to escape from the spider.  It's not as far as I can tell, and I
    can't really see why.

    The game exhibits other branches as well (aside from the optional spider), in
    fact the more I play the game the more options and variation I find.  Somehow
    though this variation is presented poorly.  It's almost as if the game is trying
    to hide the fact that multiple solutions whilst letting players discover a
    solution that's natural to them.  It's hard to say what's going on without
    getting spoilery, but consider the spider combat.  Because of the way its
    arranged it's entirely likely that players that discover the spider combat will
    not discover the alternate path, and won't even be aware that there is one.
    Similarly, players that discover the alternate path will probably not discover
    the spider combat.  A similar situation exists with the thief.  It's cool that
    the game admits multiple solutions so some players will naturally discover one
    way and some players will naturally discover another, but I think most players
    will not realise that they have the option.  Tower of the Elephant is quite a
    short game, but exploring the alternate solutions provides a fair amount of
    replay value; and I encourage all players to do that so that Andersson's coding
    isn't wasted on you.

    The game has a cruel moment (possibly more than one).  If you penetrate the
    secrets of the tower sufficiently but then leave before settling some business
    then you can wind up in an unwinnable state, confronting an all too mighty Yara,
    without it being clear and beyond the reach of undo.  This is probably a bug
    more than intentional.  Because of a slight clumsiness in the conversation it's
    perhaps a little bit easy to stumble into accidentally.

    Overall I find the game engaging.  Conan, the PC, is a man of action and the
    writing encourages you to take action; it's compelling.  The situations are
    vivid and unusual.  When I wasn't frustrated by the puzzles I enjoyed them.
    NPCs are well characterized and sometimes surprising.  Conversation (relying
    heavily on Eric Eve's extensions I suspect) mostly works well with an ASK / TELL
    interface with explicitly listed topics.  There are perhaps a few too many
    precious materials around --- once Conan gets to the tower everything is made of
    ivory, topaz, gold, sapphire --- but I guess that's just the in style when
    you're an all powerful priest.  I feel that a small amount of repair work on
    this game --- clueing one or puzzles a bit more, not trapping Conan in the room
    with the spider, a few bug fixes --- would remove the flaws and allow what I
    think is quite a good game to shine through.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     ___. .___    _    ___.     ___.
    /  _| |   \  / \  / ._|    /  _|
    \  \  | o_/ |   | | |_.    \  \
    .\  \ | |   | o | | | |    .\  \
    |___/ |_|   |_|_| \___|    |___/ PECIFICS

    SPAG Specifics is a small section of SPAG dedicated to providing in-
    depth critical analysis of IF games, spoilers most emphatically
    included.

    WARNING! SPOILERS BELOW FOR THE FOLLOWING GAME:

    Damnatio Memoriae

    PROCEED NO FURTHER UNLESS YOU HAVE PLAYED THIS GAME!

    THIS IS NOT A TEST! GENUINE SPOILERS TO FOLLOW!

    LAST CHANCE TO AVOID SPOILAGE!

    From: Paul O'Brian (obrian SP@G colorado.edu)

    TITLE: Damnatio Memoriae
    AUTHOR: Emily Short
    E-MAIL: emshort SP@G mindspring.com
    DATE: 2006
    PARSER: Inform 7
    SUPPORTS: Z-code interpreters
    AVAILABILITY: Freeware (IF Archive)
    URL: http://www.inform-fiction.org/I7Downloads/Examples/dm/
    VERSION: Release 5

    Damnatio Memoriae is a tiny game, but it's got plenty of quality. There are a
    few multiple-solution puzzles and the skeleton of a story built around an
    "accretive PC" model, where a winning playthrough only comes from the lessons
    taught by a few losing iterations. The writing is reasonably good, as one might
    expect from Emily Short, and the setting puts her considerable knowledge of
    ancient Rome to use. It takes hardly any time to play, and repays exploration
    with a surprising depth of implementation.

    All that said, I think I made two mistakes in approaching DM. One was assuming
    that because it shares a universe with Savoir-Faire, the details of its magic
    system would be identical to that game. The other mistake was forgetting that
    this game's raison d'etre is to be example code for Inform 7, not necessarily to
    be a complete and satisfying game in itself. Consequently, I found myself
    feeling disappointed by finding only anticlimactic, abrupt endings, and so
    turned to the walkthrough after winning but still feeling unsatisfied. From
    there, I became confused and frustrated by the way this game's magic differed
    from that of S-F. These factors combined to make my playing experience less than
    fun.

    It didn't help that the first winning ending I reached was, I think, buggily
    incomplete. There was a "time's up" message and a "You have won" message, but no
    connective material between them, which of course felt bare and anticlimactic.
    I'm assuming this was a bug, but there were a number of places in the game where
    logical connections felt missing. For instance, in a branch where I had killed
    Clemens, left him in the study, and ducked outside, I thought I'd hide under a
    pile of hay. Here's what happened:

        >hide
        What do you want to hide under?

        >hay
        Without some decoy, they'll certainly look hard enough to find you.

    What, the corpse of my doppelganger up in the study isn't enough of a decoy?

    I chalk these lacunae up to the fact that the point here is not to create a
    perfect, polished game but rather to demonstrate Inform 7 rules within the
    context of a nominally game-like structure. Also, despite the fact that this
    game is tiny, the number of possible interactions between objects makes for a
    plethora of implementation details, so it's natural that without extensive beta
    -testing (as a full-fledged game would have received), some would be missed. As
    I said, I mistakenly entered the game with the wrong expectation about that, and
    in any case, I feel like I'm beginning to cross over into the uncouth practice
    of airing bugs in a review rather than privately to the author, so let me move
    on to a different topic: the functional differences between this game's magic
    system and that of Savoir-Faire.

    I had never played S-F to completion, so I prefaced my approach to this game by
    playing through its larger cousin. Savoir-Faire is a marvelous game, with an
    internally consistent magic system of linking and reverse linking that enables
    both its puzzles and its story. However, the logic of linking in Damnatio
    Memoriae parts ways with S-F in several areas, so I found it a disadvantage to
    have S-F so fresh in my memory as I played DM. For one thing, Savoir-Faire
    disallows linking anything to the PC, saying, "Linking yourself is generally
    considered a very bad idea." In DM, however, linking the PC is an important
    tool. This hurdle is easily cleared, but it leaves the player to figure out how
    linkages between people operate, and their operations are in fact rather
    counterintuitive. On top of this, DM also adds a new kind of linkage: slave
    linkage. The differences between the three types of links can be subtle indeed.
    Consider these three messages:

        >link clemens to me
        (first unlinking Clemens)
        You build a mutually-effective link between Clemens and yourself.

        >reverse link clemens to me
        You reverse link Clemens to yourself (son of Julia and Agrippa, who died
    before you were born). While one of you lives, so does the other.

        >slave link clemens to me
        You build the link, enslaving Clemens to yourself. It is an expedient
    Augustus has been using for years: now any attempt upon your life will instead
    kill your slave.

    On the face of it, these messages would seem to indicate that the regular link
    allows you to control Clemens, the reverse link causes harm to both when
    anything is inflicted on either, while the slave link transfers that harm from
    you to Clemens. However, a simple link doesn't allow you to control Clemens.
    Instead, a regular link behaves in the way I expected a reverse link to act, and
    vice versa.

    The other significant difference between S-F's linking and that in DM is that DM
    is much less consistent about disallowing linkages. In Savoir-Faire, you could
    depend on the fact that unless two objects had some sort of common quality, they
    could not be linked. Damnatio Memoriae is a little more capricious:

        >link window to pitcher
        The window is insufficiently similar to the painted glass pitcher of water
    for the two to be linked.

        >link letter to pitcher
        You build a mutually-effective link between the old letter and the painted
    glass pitcher of water.

    I was able to understand the first result a bit more when I realized belatedly
    that there's probably no glass in the window, but that still doesn't explain how
    I can link the pitcher to a letter. Similarly:

        >link pitcher to clemens
        This would work better if the painted glass pitcher of water were a person.

        >link vase to clemens
        You build a mutually-effective link between the vase and Clemens.

    I'm not sure how much these inconsistencies would have bothered me if I hadn't
    just played Savoir-Faire, but that game sets a standard that Damnatio Memoriae
    fails to meet. Consequently, I felt a lot of annoyance at seeing solutions in
    the walkthrough that never would have occurred to me, since I was expecting DM's
    magic system to be more like that of S-F.

    This is a whole lot of kvetching over a sample game, and in a way, it's a nice
    problem to have: Emily's work, even other samples like Bronze, is of such
    impeccable quality that I've begun to hold even her slightest output to what may
    be a ridiculously high standard. When a game like Damnatio Memoriae fails to
    meet that standard, I'm more disappointed than I would be in another author's
    work, and linking (sorry) this game to one of her real masterpieces only
    aggravated the problem. I guess all this is to say that I'd love to see other
    games set in the various historical periods of the Lavori d'Aracne universe, but
    I hope they're created as games rather than as samples. That way, the focus can
    be on story and craft, rather than on teaching the features of a system. That's
    my selfish desire as a player, mind you -- no doubt when I'm working on learning
    Inform 7 I'll wish just the opposite.

    SUBMISSION POLICY ---------------------------------------------------------

    SPAG is a non-paying fanzine specializing in reviews of text adventure games, a.
    k.a. Interactive Fiction. This includes the classic Infocom games and similar
    games, but also some graphic adventures where the primary player-game
    communication is text based. Any and all text-based games are eligible for
    review, though if a game has been reviewed three times in SPAG, no further
    reviews of it will be accepted unless they are extraordinarily original and/or
    insightful. SPAG reviews should be free of spoilers, with the exception of
    reviews submitted to SPAG Specifics, where spoilers are allowed in the service
    of in-depth discussion. In addition, reviewers should play a game to completion
    before submitting a review. There are some exceptions to this clause --
    competition games reviewed after 2 hours, unfinishable games, games with
    hundreds of endings, etc. -- if in doubt, ask me first.

    Authors retain the rights to use their reviews in other contexts. We accept
    submissions that have been previously published elsewhere, although original
    reviews are preferred.

    For a more detailed version of this policy, see the SPAG FAQ at http://www.
    sparkynet.com/spag/spag.faq.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

               Thank you for helping to keep text adventures alive!

Click here for a printable, plain text version of this issue.